| "Say it ain't so!" |
| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Economy | |
| NYT: Stimulus 'disappointing' | |
| 2011-04-24 | |
| |
| Posted by:ryuge |
| #10 The "stimulus" was never intended to repair the economy. Watch Robert Reich and Charlie Rangel discuss turning it from an infrastructure plan into a slush fund for the Democrats' victim groups: |
| Posted by: Ricky bin Ricardo (Abu Babaloo) 2011-04-24 22:37 |
| #9 NYTs and Stimulus |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2011-04-24 17:25 |
| #8 Apparently the NYT's cut wasn't big enough. |
| Posted by: RandomJD 2011-04-24 12:58 |
| #7 There is nothing but stupid in that rag of a paper. I have blocked it from all of my machines because of RHTHVN crap as well as I do not want to give sewage my patronage. This stupid rag of a paper wanted obama so bad, and now they are turning on him. They have not had a truthful article in more than ten years. Screw you schulturder. |
| Posted by: newc 2011-04-24 12:44 |
| #6 "Stimulus 'disappointing'" Not to me, or most of the rest of us here. We knew before it started that it wouldn't work, except as a sop to Bambi's Not disappointed, disgusted. |
| Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2011-04-24 12:40 |
| #5 Where's the "Master of the Obvious" pic? |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2011-04-24 12:01 |
| #4 The coverage of the economic disaster by the Wall Street Journal has been little better than that provided by the NYT. |
| Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2011-04-24 10:24 |
| #3 the New Yorl Behind-the-Times was shilling as long as possible for ObbutadisasterÂ…too busy covering the Abu Ghraib story. |
| Posted by: jack salami 2011-04-24 08:46 |
| #2 wil their next story be about ... Stimulus II |
| Posted by: Zebulon Thranter9685 2011-04-24 08:29 |
| #1 I think most people were already aware of this. The NYT is somewhat behind the curve, as usual... wil their next story be about the election of Harry Truman as president? |
| Posted by: Tom 2011-04-24 07:54 |