You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Quiet embarrassment in Pakistan after killing of bin Laden
2011-05-04
There were no protests and no extra security in Pakistain on Tuesday, a day after the killing of the late Osama bin Laden
... who is currently rooming with Hitler and Himmler...
by US forces, just a sense of embarrassment and indifference that the al Qaeda leader had managed to lie low for years in a Pakistain garrison town.

Bin Laden was rubbed out early on Monday morning by US commandos who dropped by helicopter into the compound where he had lived since 2005.

It had long been thought that he was hiding in Pakistain's lawless tribal belt in the northwest near the border with Afghanistan, so it came as a huge surprise to many that he had been holed up in a town less than two hours' drive from Islamabad and just a stone's throw from a military academy.

President Asif Ali President Ten Percent Zardari
... sticky-fingered husband of the late Benazir Bhutto ...
, writing in the Washington Post, said Pakistain's security forces were left out of the raid on the hideout in the town of Abbottabad and insisted that the authorities had thought he was somewhere else.

However,
The didactic However...
Zardari has made no address to the people of a country where anti-American sentiment runs high, prompting one Twitter user to tweet "Most wanted man is killed on Pak soil and the Pres doesn't address his people, instead writes an op-ed for USA."

Army and spy agency silent

There were some very small demonstrations by hardline groups after the killing of bin Laden, but it was business as usual in the capital on Tuesday, with no signs of increased security.

In Pakistain's largest city of Bloody Karachi, however, a protest was expected later against "increasing US involvement" in Pakistain.

Still, many ordinary Paks said bin Laden's killing was of no consequence to them. "It doesn't make any difference to my life whether he is killed or not," said Zain Khan, a labourer in the northwestern city of Beautiful Downtown Peshawar.

While Islamabad's alliance with Washington is unpopular, especially following a campaign of US drone strikes on beturbanned goon targets in the border areas, many people are also tired of the suicide kabooms that have racked the country for years.

"He (bin Laden) did not have much popularity today because people have been killed in violence linked to al Qaeda," commentator Ejaz Haider said.

The immediate reaction was muted because Paks didn't identify with the ideology of al Qaeda, the former head of Pakistain's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Lieutenant-General Hamid Gul
The nutty former head of Pakistain's ISI, now Godfather to Mullah Omar's Talibs and good buddy and consultant to al-Qaeda's high command...
said.

But there was anger building up over the violation of Pakistain's illusory sovereignty by US forces who carried out the raid.

"That's an affront to a nation of 180 million people," Gul told Rooters. "The people of Pakistain are very angry with their military that they have sold us" to the Americans.

Both the army and the ISI spy agency were conspicuously silent on the raid, which has raised suspicions they knew all along where bin Laden was hiding.

"Many of us didn't believe in the image of bin Laden as a wandering Old Man of the Mountains, living on plants and insects in an inhospitable cave somewhere on the porous Pakistain-Afghan border," wrote author Salman Rushdie in a piece for The Daily Beast.

"An extremely big man, 6-foot 4-inches tall in a country where the average male height is around 5-foot 8, wandering around unnoticed for ten years while half the satellites above the earth were looking for him?"

He said Pakistain faced tough questions and "if it does not provide those answers, perhaps time has come to declare it a terrorist state and expel it from the comity of nations."

"Picking and choosing beturbanned goons"

Washington has in the past accused Pakistain of lacking the resolve to root out bully boyz and of maintaining ties to fighters targeting US troops in neighbouring Afghanistan.

In October 2009, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
... sometimes described as the Smartest Woman in the World and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Tallyrand ...
voiced dismay that bin Laden and other prominent bully boyz had not yet been caught and suggested Pak complicity.

Within hours of the operation that killed bin Laden, US politicians were asking how he had been able to live in a populated area of Pakistain without anyone in authority knowing about it. Some said it was time to review the billions in aid the United States provides Pakistain.

Pak newspapers reflected those concerns, warning that the nation may come under renewed pressure.

"Pakistain has found itself in quite the embarrassing situation ... Whilst we have been allies of the US, we have been very trying partners, picking and choosing the bully boyz we wanted to root out and the ones we wanted to protect," the Daily Times said.

"It is hoped we will not be on the receiving end of a negative fallout with the Americans, who are in this war for (the) long haul."

But Zardari said in his article in the Washington Post that Pakistain was as much a victim of al Qaeda bully boyz as any country and denied any notion that the authorities had failed to act.
Posted by:Fred

#7  The bulk of the evidence so far obtained points to two things which don't jibe well. (1) A big chunk of the Pak gov't and ISI knew perfectly well where OBL was staying all these years & they supported him fully. (2) A key chunk of the Pak gov't and ISI pulled strings in the right places, at the right times, to allow OBL to be cornered and shot without interference, and with plausible deniability for part (2). There is no plausible deniability for (1).
We'll see who in the Pak system gets terminated with extreme prejudice. Probably be people in both (1) and (2).
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-05-04 13:40  

#6  Note that this raid was months in the planning, and yet there were no leaks getting back to Osama bin Laden. That is at best puzzling. Posted by Anguper Hupomosing9418

Two things make this old ball rotate, and the other one is MONEY. Perhaps someday we'll know just how much money it took to buy silence. As far as the helo's go, they could have been... I say possibly could have been air-refuel capable.
Posted by: Besoeker   2011-05-04 13:27  

#5  Jerry Pournelle had this to say: The PAK ISI is a leaky organization. At some point in this operation the US had to bring in the Pakistani government. The surviving helicopter needed refueling. They had just shot up a compound in a peaceful and orderly neighborhood, they had a body aboard, and they had to get back to the ship. Just who called who to do what isn't clear, but it is a fair inference that the Pakistani military had orders to lay off. Exactly when they got those orders, and who arranged them, hasn't come out and never will.

Note that this raid was months in the planning, and yet there were no leaks getting back to Osama bin Laden. That is at best puzzling.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-05-04 13:20  

#4  Next target should be Gul I suspect there will be many located & targeted over the next few months due to Binny's treasure trove of incriminating evidence.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-05-04 13:18  

#3  I feel a little embarrassed as well.

I thought for sure OBL was in Rawalpindi.

Shows what I know.

And I agree with WM above--Gul needs to move up on the target list.
Posted by: charger   2011-05-04 12:18  

#2  Next target should be Gul
Posted by: Water Modem   2011-05-04 11:59  

#1  It had long been thought that he was hiding in Pakistain's lawless tribal belt

Except, apparently, by some UCLA Geography class two years ago, who picked Abbottobad at 90% certainty. (Might want to check the c.v. on that prof.)

"Pakistain has found itself in quite the embarrassing situation "

Which one? That Osama was hiding in your living room and you didn't notice? Or, alternatively, that you were hiding the world's most wanted criminal in your living room? Your national sovereignty was violated and you allowed it? Or that you never even noticed until it was over? If the latter, it must be tough being a Pak Air Force officer trying to explain how it would be different if it was an Indian attack - you know, the ones they've been spending billions to defend against.
Posted by: Glenmore   2011-05-04 07:53  

00:00