You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Pakistan Arrests C.I.A. Informants in Bin Laden Raid
2011-06-15
WASHINGTON -- Pakistan's top military spy agency has arrested some of the Pakistani informants who fed information to the Central Intelligence Agency in the months leading up to the raid that led to the death of Osama bin Laden, according to American officials.
It goes on from there, nothing more that we don't already know, except
For now, at least, America's relationship with Pakistan keeps getting tripped up. When he visited Pakistan, Mr. Panetta offered evidence of collusion between Pakistani security officials and the militants staging attacks in Afghanistan.

American officials said Mr. Panetta presented satellite photographs of two bomb-making factories that American spies several weeks ago had asked the ISI to raid. When Pakistani troops showed up days later, the militants were gone, causing American officials to question whether the militants had been warned by someone on the Pakistani side.

Shortly after the failed raids, the Defense Department put a hold on a $300 million payment reimbursing Pakistan for the cost of deploying more than 100,000 troops along the border with Afghanistan, two officials said. The Pentagon declined to comment on the payment, except to say it was "continuing to process several claims."
Posted by:Thing From Snowy Mountain

#6  How about we up the ante and be even bigger smiling azzholes than them while we build our relationship with India.
Posted by: Griting Smith6978   2011-06-15 23:31  

#5  This action clearly says -

1. they were never seriously looking for Ben Laden
2. they are on the other side
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-06-15 11:06  

#4  "It's just business."
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-06-15 10:04  

#3  The US skunked them so bad by nailing binny while he was under their protection, that they have to take revenge against *somebody*.

But that hypersensitivity is useful. For example, before if we knew that an ISI chieftain was dirty, and we told the Pakis, they would just shrug. But now, if we "inform" them that *we* know he's dirty, it will be like announcing we are planning to 'hit' him like binny. He'll run for the hills, or better yet, try to trade us his confederates in exchange for *not* putting a cap in him.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-06-15 10:03  

#2  Don't they mean alleged informants?

How do we know it's not some dude with a lovely wife coveted by some ISI Major?

Radio said one was the owner of the house the CIA used to spy on Binny. I'm sure the CIA advertised their identiy AND their mission to the owner. It's probably on all the Pak application to rent forms - "Are you a CIA Tool? Yes? No? Not Sure? Circle one."
Posted by: Bobby   2011-06-15 06:41  

#1  At least the Govt realise the problem is not in Afghanistan but next door!
Posted by: Paul D   2011-06-15 03:07  

00:00