You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Does 9/11 terror threat involve dirty bomb?
2011-09-10
Posted by:Frozen Al

#4  Cancelled that rag years ago. They still push the AGW BS.
Posted by: HellFish   2011-09-10 21:33  

#3  Scientific American has become less and less of both since I read it in the '80s. I don't touch that Goracle rag now.
Posted by: Frank G   2011-09-10 18:49  

#2  November 2002 Sci Am, but it costs $7.95 to see the article now.

But JPL covers the topic, borrowing some of the Sci Am graphics at - JPL link
Posted by: Bobby   2011-09-10 16:15  

#1  I read a Scientific American article (maybe ten years ago, before the OD'd on Bush-Derangement Syndrome)that the panic would kill far more than the radioactivity.

So I - 25 miles south of the Capitol - shall not panic. Probably safer inside anyway.
Posted by: Bobby   2011-09-10 15:13  

00:00