You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Pakistan to lodge complaint with UN against drones
2011-09-20
ISLAMABAD: Human Rights Ministry (HRM) has decided to take up matter of drone attacks with United Nations under international humanitarian law and file an official complain to Special Rapper Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions.

Addressing a media briefing on Monday, Adviser to Prime Minister Mustafa Nawaz Khokar said the matter would be discussed with all stakeholders of the government after taking them on board an official complain will be lodged.
Sovereign countries usually take care of terrorism and don't force others to do it for them...
He categorically made it clear that drone strikes are not acceptable.
So do something about it. I'm sure the mighty Pak Air Force will step up...
He said so far the debate has only circled around loss of collateral damages and not about the specific legislation of the strikes in the light of international humanitarian law (law of war).

He explained that apart from being in violation of Pakistan's territorial sovereignty, there was growing consensus among International law experts
Is that as lacking in meaning as a scientific consensus?
that these strikes can be aptly described as "Target Killing", or "ExtraJudicial Killing" primarily because the targets are being 'taken out' without giving them opportunity to defend themselves in court of law.
"Emerging international law" is a code-phrase for the progressive community as "law as we'd like it to be".
This view is gaining ground in the international legal fraternity and is supported by various international treaties as well as United States' own constitution.
Look in Article VII...
Mustafa mentioned that one does not have to be a legal expert to see that there is blatant disregard of International Law, Customary Law, treaties and conventions by the American administration.
Not to mention state law, city ordinances, copyright law, trade-dress law, patent law and the Harvard law review...
The moral and legal obligations are being flouted by the US administration, he said, adding, complain regarding drone attacks has already been lodged with US several times but unfortunately it was not proved fruitful and the HRM has decided to take up this matter with UN.

Mustafa Khokar further said that a photo exhibition would start in London on Tuesday (today) titled "Gaming in Waziristan", in which the snapshots of drone attacks victims, including corpses of children, women, clothes, shoes and other belongings of these people would be displayed to unveil the reality in front of international forums.
Wanna see Mustafa wet his pants? Tell him to look up at the sky and smile...
The adviser said that America and its allies record is questionable ranging from disrespecting the environmental treaties to torturing detainee and now extra-judicial killings. He hoped that as the UN Special Rapporteur is considering the matter, Pakistan's official communication in this regard might prove to be highly productive.
Posted by:Steve White

#10  No we're not. That's the point of reinforcing the border regardless of anyone's 'feelings'.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-09-20 21:13  

#9  well Hatrack, I guess that means were not to sovereign in our Southwest borders then, huh?
Posted by: texhooey   2011-09-20 18:04  

#8  I would suggest if you do so that you put a 500lb iron bomb with a time fuse on board first.

I suggest two, one fused 5 minutes before the other, think of the morons who see one explode and think "OK it's clear now".
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2011-09-20 13:53  

#7  Hague Convention of 1907 - a neutral country has the obligation not to allow its territory to be used by a belligerent. If the neural country is unwilling or unable to prevent this, the other belligerent has the right to take appropriate counteraction.

That's just the sort of oppression by colonialist european squares we're complaining about!
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2011-09-20 11:35  

#6  Hague Convention of 1907 - a neutral country has the obligation not to allow its territory to be used by a belligerent. If the neural country is unwilling or unable to prevent this, the other belligerent has the right to take appropriate counteraction.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-09-20 10:50  

#5  If you can't control the area, you are not "soverign" there. QED.
Posted by: Guillibaldo Hatrack1304   2011-09-20 10:42  

#4  I would suggest if you do so that you put a 500lb iron bomb with a time fuse on board first.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-09-20 09:08  

#3  I like the way you think Mr. Modem.
Posted by: Scooter McGruder   2011-09-20 03:11  

#2  As per yesterday's firefight between Talibunnies and Pak army over a dead drone they both likely wanted to sell to China.... and this article today... its time to go to the civil air boneyard and turn lots of old non-mil planes into drones and randomly crash them in the Pak tribal areas in order to stimulate Red on Red fighting.
Posted by: Water Modem   2011-09-20 00:57  

#1  I think the drone strikes are quite acceptable. I think the HRM should be focusing their attention to more pressing local matters.
Posted by: Creregum Glolump8403   2011-09-20 00:16  

00:00