You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Pakistanis at risk over world inaction on floods: WFP
2011-10-04
The United Nations warned on Monday that the international community had failed to respond to the latest flooding crisis in Pakistan, leaving three million people in urgent need of food handouts.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but how's it the rest of the world's responsibility rather than the Pak government's? Seems like it should be part of that sovereignty thing they're always harping on.
The nuclear-armed Muslim state has suffered two consecutive years of floods but has been at increasing risk of international isolation since US troops found and killed Osama bin Laden near the capital in May. "Somehow the present flooding and the humanitarian impact of the present flooding has not yet picked the interest, the focus of the world," said Ramiro Lopes da Silva, deputy executive director of the World Food Programme (WFP).
Perhaps because last year the world kicked in and the Pak functionaries were at their usual level of mediocrity, with the victims from last year's floods still waiting for relief when this year's rolled around. Some of them, in fact, were earthquake survivors, another incident that the world kicked in for and received in return a hearty slap in the face. Remember the party hacks demanding that aid had to be handed out through Pak organizations? And the religious party hacks demanding that women couldn't be hired? That non-Muslim rescuers depart? The foolishness never ends, does it? But the interest of civilized states with their own damned problems sometimes does.
"If we have no resources, we have no response," he told a news conference in Islamabad after visiting the flood-hit southern province of Sindh.

On September 18, the United Nations led an appeal for dollar 357 million in emergency funding to shore up rescue and relief efforts for millions of people suffering after floods swept away homes and farm land in southern Pakistan.

"The funding is not coming as swiftly and as fast at the levels it came to the response of the floods of last year," said Lopes da Silva.
If the world community doesn't get a move on and provide the needed funds then the Paks will have to back down from what's really important, and they'll have fewer plutonium bombs, fewer infiltrators into Kashmir and fewer Haqqanis sporting the good life in Pashtunistan. And we can't have that, can we?
"Donors are being challenged by the level of resources required to address similar needs of humanitarian situations across the world," he added.

Last month, the United Nations said only the Japanese government had pledged dollar 10 million in response to the appeal.

The Pakistani government says more than 350 people have been killed and over eight million people affected this year by floods, following the 21 million hit last year in the nation's worst ever disaster.

The WFP official said three million Pakistanis were in urgent need of food security and said the UN agency would help "2.4 million of those severely affected by food insecurity".

Pakistan has been forced to fend off charges of mishandling the crisis by failing to invest in adequate measures to mitigate against seasonal rains, after last year's floods caused losses of dollar 10 billion.

The country has faced increasingly trenchant criticism in the West for its alleged double dealings with Islamist militants opposed to Indian rule in Kashmir and fighting American troops in neighbouring Afghanistan.
Posted by:Fred

#13  *Yawn*

(Again)
Posted by: Barbara   2011-10-04 18:07  

#12   The US should buy Pakistan's fissile material in exchange for flood aid. A win-win all around. Any supporters?
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-10-04 17:25  

#11  Who cares.
Posted by: Hellfish   2011-10-04 12:17  

#10  The problem, Besoeker, is that Pakistan would go apeshit if India got the same attention they did, and particularly (in your scenario) if India was the first stop on the visit.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2011-10-04 12:02  

#9  The US gov should tell the Pakis to use their own troops for relief ops. After all we're paying for them.
Posted by: Eohippus Phater7165   2011-10-04 10:33  

#8  Could be, could be NORK model.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2011-10-04 10:30  

#7  My compassion fatigue has crossed the line into cynical mockery.

Does that make me a bad person?
Posted by: AlanC   2011-10-04 08:59  

#6  Insh'allan
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2011-10-04 07:18  

#5  Hey, maybe the Chinese could send a carrier?
Posted by: Ebboque Gray5839   2011-10-04 02:54  

#4  I think the table is being set up for a run. Here is a possible scenario:

Staged anti-Pak rhetoric increases and smolders on for a few more months, accusations, counter-accusations, etc. Obama steps in around the 'Eid-ul-Fitr timeframe, selects a special Envoy and a team travels to Pakistan with charity (food) for the poor. Deals are cut, a presidential summit is arranged for next Spring. The Light Bringer travels to India (more deals $$$$), then Afghanistan (more deals $$$$), then Pakistan for the grand finale of deal making. Pervez Musharraf hosts summit, declares the Light Bringer a global peacemaker and geopolitical genius. Just in time for the election.
Posted by: Besoeker   2011-10-04 01:36  

#3  Sorry, my Giveadam is in the shop.
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2011-10-04 01:02  

#2  The Pak govt is cause-and-effect challenged. Fixing this will take time---geologic time.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2011-10-04 00:57  

#1  Perhaps they can pull some of the funding from their nuke bomb program. They have more than they need and are making more....
Posted by: tipover   2011-10-04 00:56  

00:00