You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Democrats mobilize over Clarence Thomas ethics investigation
2011-10-07
Forty-six House Democrats have joined forces this week to ask the chamber's Judiciary Committee to investigate Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas for ethics violations. The Democratic lawmakers' complaint argues that reports of Thomas' actions--including those related to the high-profile political activism of his wife, Virginia "Ginni" Thomas--have raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

"Public records clearly demonstrate that Justice Thomas has failed to accurately disclose information concerning the income and employment status of his wife, as required by law," Democrats led by Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) and Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) wrote in a letter (pdf) Wednesday to leaders of the Judiciary Committee. The Democrats also question whether Thomas accurately reported gifts and inappropriately solicited donations.

Blumenauer's office confirmed to The Ticket Thursday afternoon that 46 lawmakers have signed on.

Liberal watchdog group Common Cause recently reported that Thomas' wife earned around $1.6 million between 1997 and 2011--and that Justice Thomas did not report her income over the same time span. Thomas said he "inadvertently" failed to file information on wife's employment "due to a misunderstanding of the filing instructions."
Now I know why Obama was happy to let the health care case go to the supreme court. They are planning on taking Thomas out.
Posted by:DarthVader

#6  While the Democrat senate would never vote to impeach Holder, no matter the offense, the House has several ways to both utterly derail any Thomas harassment.

For example, they can demand a special prosecutor for Holder, or they could impeach him. In either case, nobody is going to be talking about Thomas for weeks, and the public will just see any Thomas investigation as political tit-for-tat. So they will ignore both.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-10-07 16:51  

#5  The Left has finally figured out that Thomas is smarter than they are, so they've decided to lynch him ASAP.
Posted by: Secret Master   2011-10-07 15:43  

#4  Impeachment can happen any time a House majority gets around to it. Conviction on articles of impeachment by the Senate is a different matter. Eric "Place" Holder richly deserves impeachment and removal from office.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-10-07 14:59  

#3  The only way a supreme court justice can be restricted is by impeachment, starting in the House, which ain't gonna happen.

Amusingly, while the Senate needs a 2/3rds majority to convict, the House only needs a simple majority to impeach. So if the Senate gets too obnoxious about it, the House can decide to impeach Kagan, Holder, Sotomayer, Biden, and even Obama.

The Senate would be *obligated* to actually hold a trial for them, even if it was for just a day.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2011-10-07 14:49  

#2  His response is every bit as good as the many Democrats who seem to have misplaced this or that form. Glass house and stones people.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge    2011-10-07 14:34  

#1  Elena Kagan has to recuse. They're trying to balance out by removing Thomas
Posted by: Frank G   2011-10-07 13:14  

00:00