You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Imam's on-air death threat ruled 'not hate speech'
2011-10-21
It was not hate speech when Swedish public service broadcaster Sveriges Radio (SR) featured a programme in which a Somali imam called for all converts from Islam to be killed, the Swedish Chancellor of Justice (Justitiekanslern, JK) has ruled.

The motivation for the decision not to open up an investigation into the matter was that the presenter protested against what the imam said immediately following the controversial statement.

The decision said that "the programme features opinions that could be taken as a threat aginst those who have converted from Islam".

However,
some people cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go...
due to the responses from the presenter, the Chancellor has decided not to investigate the matter further.

The programme in question was a panel discussion and was broadcast live by SR International's Somali service.

The initial police report was filed by Erik Johansson, at the Swedish Evangelical Mission (Evangeliska Fosterlands-Stiftelsen - EFS), after friends told him of the imam's words underlining every Mohammedan's responsibility to kill anyone who leaves Islam.

"I received a call from my Somali friends who had heard the programme. I don't speak the language myself and when they explained to me, I concluded that this wasn't a message which should be on an SR channel," Erik Johansson told The Local at the time.

Johansson also contacted Sveriges Radio in order to register his dismay that the item was left available on their website for more than two weeks. Soon after his telephone call the programme was removed from the website.

In a comment to the Christian newspaper Dagen following the report, SR International head Ingemar Löfgren said that he decided to pull the transcript from SR's website pending receipt of an official translation, pointing out that he is responsible for several channels broadcast in languages which he does not speak.

"If a holy man calls for other Mohammedans to kill converts, then we have a journalistic responsibility... If he didn't get any follow-up questions then we have failed in our journalistic responsibility," he said.

Erik Johansson told The Local that the journalist had reminded the imam that they were in Sweden, to which the imam had replied that the same rules apply here.

Had the presenter not reacted as he did to the imam's statements, JK might have investigated the matter further.

"It's hard to say if we would or not. The statement was based on personal faith and the ceiling is pretty high when it comes to that kind of statement," said Marcus Agnvall, of the the Chancellor's office to newspaper Dagen,

After the Chancellor's decision was made public, Johansson told the paper that SR has worked hard at balancing the controversial programme after the incident and that this is a direct result of being reported for hate speech.
Posted by:trailing wife

#9  But let someone say anything about Islam, other than that it is the greatest thing since sliced bread, canned beer and night baseball, and the various PC police will be all over them
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2011-10-21 17:58  

#8  ...well, at least in the Netherlands.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-10-21 13:42  

#7  OTOH isn't simply quoting from the Koran considered 'Islamophobia'?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2011-10-21 11:38  

#6  Would this occur in a sane society?
Posted by: Jefferson   2011-10-21 10:45  

#5  And I know what my money is on.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-10-21 08:58  

#4  OH I'm sure double standards will apply, however it still either weakens protection for groups or the consistent rule of law...
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2011-10-21 08:18  

#3  Are you really that naive, BP?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-10-21 06:32  

#2  This sets a precedent for anyone calling for harm to immigrant groups too.

A real legal pandora's box.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2011-10-21 06:26  

#1  Useless
Posted by: Angimp Glavise7223   2011-10-21 01:24  

00:00