You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Low popularity won't stop Obama from raking in campaign cash
2011-10-25
[L.A. Times] President B.O. was airborne Monday morning, winging his way aboard Air Force One to six fundraisers in Nevada and Caliphornia over the next two days.

Obama is at the nadir of his popularity but that doesn't mean his fundraising will be lagging. On the contrary, members of Obama's finance team say he will meet and probably exceed all fundraising goals, continuing to place him far ahead of any GOP rival. That's because for incumbent presidents, there is little correlation between popularity and fundraising.

Donors are a small percentage of the electorate and they often are a candidate's most loyal backers, getting fired up when their man (or woman) is under attack. Donors to an incumbent president also include what we at the Los Angeles Times/Tribune Washington Bureau call "investors" -- donors who make contributions as a very practical way of protecting their financial interests. It makes sense to back an administration that can still help or hurt with government-related decisions, grants and projects.

Like Obama, former President George W. Bush continued to do well financially when he was at the lowest points in his popularity during his second term.

And incumbent presidents at this point in a reelection race have another advantage over all other candidates: Obama faces no primary fight and can raise money beyond his traditional campaign account by fundraising for the national political party, which is allowed to accept contributions in larger amounts. It's a big advantage in the traditional world of candidate fundraising.

For example, GOP presidential prospects can charge attendees only the maximum contribution that the Federal Election Commission allows individuals to contribute to an official candidate. The FEC has limited such contributions to $2,500 for the primary campaign and $2,500 for the general election. But an incumbent president can charge far more by raising additional funds through an account that is linked with the national party committee.

With the GOP nomination still looming, there is no settled Republican candidate to raise those big contributions on behalf of the national party committee.
Posted by:Fred

#7  Jerry Pournelle's take on this: Los Angeles braces for an imperial visit. The bards are preparing the panegyric. The police are turning out to barricade many citizens in their homes, lest they inconvenience the President or his 30 vehicle cavalcade of minions. The President will meet more or less exclusively with the 1% — actually, given that itÂ’s about $20,000 to attend his fund-raiser in Hancock Park, itÂ’s more like the .01% — before disrupting traffic at rush hours to go to Burbank where he will appear on a TV show directed at the 99%. He will probably make some kind of symbolic gesture of support to the OWS 99% denouncing the 1%, but not until his treasurer has made certain that the checks clear the bank. President ObamaÂ’s cavalcade in Los Angeles may be a bit smaller than his Virginia-Caroline motorcade, so it probably wonÂ’t be as big as Colonel QaddafiÂ’s last parade, but it will be big enough.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2011-10-25 14:22  

#6  Silly Hellfish - it's only illegal for Republicans.
Posted by: Barbara   2011-10-25 14:11  

#5  I thought it was illegal - or at least bad form to use the office of the President and it's benefits to campaign and fund raise.

That never stopped Al Gore. Why should it stop Obama? After all, when your Attorney General is Eric Holder...
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2011-10-25 13:00  

#4  I thought it was illegal - or at least bad form to use the office of the President and it's benefits to campaign and fund raise. Did this change?

Once again the FEC will not look at foreign money contributions made to the re-election campaign of the first Anti-American President.

Why?
Posted by: Hellfish   2011-10-25 12:16  

#3  This is how we got to where we are at, financial trouble wise: Pass up the sound investment in favor of the "attractive" investment...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2011-10-25 09:20  

#2  ..you'd think with all those pics of occupiers with laptops and smart phones, they'd be able to check those donor lists of the 1 percenters. Unless, they were, you know, the useful idiots in a grand astoturf production.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-10-25 07:53  

#1  Obama seems to be able to identify the 1 percenters a lot easier than the Occubaggers.
Posted by: Eohippus Phater7165   2011-10-25 00:36  

00:00