You have commented 340 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa North
NATO may do in-house legal review of Libya strikes
2011-11-12
BRUSSELS: NATO may perform an internal legal review of some of its operations in Libya to assist any outside investigation into civilian casualties, diplomats accredited to the organization say. The review would likely include all incidents in which NATO airstrikes caused civilian casualties, the diplomats said.

Luis Moreno-Ocampo, the prosecutor at the International Criminal Court in the Hague, said this month that any allegations of crimes committed by NATO in Libya would be examined “impartially and independently.”
Thus keeping Ocampo and cronies fully employed...
Moreno-OcampoÂ’s statement does not necessarily mean he will open a formal investigation. Following findings of a UN Commission of Inquiry in Libya, due in March, he could decide there is no need for further investigation or ask judges for authorization to open a formal probe.

“We are not talking about any specific incident. We are saying, ‘Yes, if there are allegations of crimes we will review that,’” Moreno-Ocampo told The Associated Press.

NATO officials say they are confident the alliance’s actions complied with international law. “In the event we receive a request for information, NATO is prepared to assist in any way it can,” said an official, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to NATO regulations.
Wonder if Ocampo and company will conduct an 'impartial and independent' review of Qaddafi's thug-boys...
Following a UN resolution authorizing the protection of civilians, NATO led a campaign of airstrikes against the regime of then-Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi from March through October. NATO leaders have hailed the precision with which the mission was carried out, citing the small number of civilian deaths caused by the bombing as evidence of its success.
Posted by:Steve White

#2  So what happens after the legal review and NATO decides it was wrong? Do they ask for a mulligan?
Posted by: SteveS   2011-11-12 16:24  

#1  But lawyers can let the likes of Jerry Sandusky roam free among us for 12 years.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2011-11-12 08:00  

00:00