You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Programming language can't be copyrighted: EU court
2011-11-30
[Dawn] A computer programming language cannot be protected by copyright, the adviser to the EU's top court said on Tuesday in an opinion that could affect the competitive IT industry.

Advocate general Yves Bot argued that programming languages -- different digital vocabularies such as HTML and Java used to make a computer perform certain tasks -- should be compared to the language used by a novelist.

The functionalities of a computer programme should also not be eligible for copyright, Bot said, adding that they are the equivalent of ideas and that protecting them would "amount to making it possible to monopolise ideas." The advocate general's opinions are not binding but the Luxembourg-based European Union
...the successor to the Holy Roman Empire, only without the Hapsburgs and the nifty uniforms and the dancing...
Court of Justice follows his advice in 80 percent of cases.

The opinion arises from a case pitting North Carolina-based SAS Institute, which provides business analytics software and services, against British software firm World Programming Ltd.

SAS launched a complaint in Britannia against WPL after the US company created a product that can execute programmes written in SAS language.

The High Court of Justice in Britannia asked the EU judges to issue a preliminary ruling to clarify the scope of EU legal protection for computer programmes.

"The functionalities of a computer program and the programming language cannot be protected by copyright," Bot said.

Bot said however that copyright can cover "the means for achieving the concrete expression" of the functionalities.

"The way in which formulae and algorithms are arranged -- like the style in which the computer program is written -- will be likely to reflect the author's own intellectual creation and therefore be eligible for protection," he said.

But the holder of a programme license can reproduce or translate a source code without the author's authorisation, under certain conditions, so as to ensure different elements of a programme work together, Bot said.
Posted by:Fred

#11  Actually, TW, you can't patent an idea - - only an invention or other embodiment of an idea. By a twist of fate I was speaking with 4 people at the US Patent Office about this earlier today!
Posted by: pcarroll   2011-11-30 16:03  

#10  So is the meta-language these programming languages often get translated to copywritable? I'm thinking about .NET, java, p-code, etc...
Those aren't written by a 'novelist'...

How about machine instructions? Can Intel copyright 'mov ds,bs'.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2011-11-30 13:44  

#9  Advocate general Yves Bot argued that programming languages -- different digital vocabularies such as HTML and Java used to make a computer perform certain tasks -- should be compared to the language used by a novelist.

Apparently this moron has no idea what is involved with programming a compiler to turn statements in this "novelist" language into machine readable code.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2011-11-30 12:15  

#8  Things are copyrighted. Ideas are patented.
Posted by: trailing wife   2011-11-30 10:59  

#7  Then the question is whether it is more appropriately a patent rather than a copyright.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-11-30 10:52  

#6  Can't copyright the language ... but you can still protect the compilers, interpreters, and run-time environments, which is where the magic happens anyway.
Posted by: Extreme Moderate   2011-11-30 10:49  

#5  How do you copyright sequences which is what in the end all the layers of code lead to - (ex:00100101110001111000111000100111001110001010111000001)?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2011-11-30 09:38  

#4  'programming languages...should be compared to the language used by a novelist...The functionalities of a computer programme should also not be eligible for copyright, Bot said, adding that they are the equivalent of ideas and that protecting them would "amount to making it possible to monopolise ideas."'


Nice. Throws Richthaven out with the bathwater.
Posted by: Skidmark   2011-11-30 09:19  

#3  Can you copyright your own nomenclature for the computing-maths?

Probably not. Good decision.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2011-11-30 08:42  

#2  This decision is similar to many other decisions by the courts in the past.

Posted by: BernardZ   2011-11-30 05:27  

#1  To paraphrase Lasarus Long, public servants are objective---they hate all creative people equally.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2011-11-30 01:37  

00:00