Submit your comments on this article |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
Russia sent military ships to base in Syria |
2011-12-13 |
Posted by:Creregum Glolump8403 |
#4 OTOH WAFF [paraph] > TURKISH MP CALLS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF "TURKISH OCCUPATION ARMY" IN CYPRUS, any + all plus to include those covert "troops/forces" Ankara doesn't formally recognize as its military servicemembers. versus * INDIAN DEFENSE FORUM > UK BUDGET-CUTTERS HAVE SLASHED US$15.0BILYUHN [UK L$10.0Bilyuhn+] FROM ARMOR PROGRAMS. Few = No? Tanks or other Armor for the UK-ies, + only one "QUEEN LIZ" CVF that may or may not become fully certified until decades in the future when its ready to be retired or scrapped??? * SAME > NATO TO RUSSIA : MISSLE RESPONSE [anti-US,NATO counter-BMD Shield] IS A WASTE OF MONEY. Mama Russia informed that the US, NATO are not their enemy. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2011-12-13 20:57 |
#3 See also WAFF > THE KUZ ARRIVES OFF THE UK. RNS ADM. KUZNETZOV, ostens anchored seeking storm shelter just outside of UK territorial waters off POrtsmouth - HMS ASTUTE is on the case! |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2011-12-13 19:06 |
#2 "Having any military force, other than the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), is very beneficial for the region, as it will prevent the outbreak of a military conflict," said [retired Admiral Viktor] Kravchenko, who was head of the Russian Navy from 1998 to 2005. Also reinforces the Russian 'claim' to their facilities at Tartus. |
Posted by: Pappy 2011-12-13 11:22 |
#1 Why does this remind me of sending gunboats to China to protect the opium trade? |
Posted by: Anonymoose 2011-12-13 10:52 |