You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Obama vows US 'military superiority' despite cuts
2012-01-06
[Dawn] President Barack Obama
We're gonna punish our enemies and we're gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us...
vowed Thursday the US military would maintain its "superiority" and bolster its presence in Asia despite planned cuts to the defense budget.

"So, yes, our military will be leaner, but the world must know, the United States is going to maintain our military superiority with armed forces that are agile, flexible and ready for the full range of contingencies and threats," Obama told news hounds at the Pentagon.

Unveiling a revised military strategy designed to reflect a more austere era, Obama said the plan called for increasing the American presence in the Pacific while moving away from large ground wars against bully boys.

"We'll be strengthening our presence in the Asia Pacific, and budget reductions will not come at the expense of this critical region," said Obama, in an unusual appearance in the Pentagon's briefing room.

"As we look beyond the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the end of long-term, nation-building with large military footprints, we'll be able to ensure our security with smaller conventional ground forces," Obama said.

The strategy review is supposed to shape Pentagon budget priorities as Obama's administration prepares for $487 billion in defense cuts over the next 10 years.

In a politically charged election year, White House officials stressed Obama was deeply involved in the strategy review and sought to portray the president as taking a responsible approach to defense spending informed by the advice of commanders.
Posted by:Fred

#8  DEFENCE FORUM INDIA > AMERICA NEEDS 62 MORE WARSHIPS TO COUNTER CHINA'S NAVY.

ARTIC = US needs to move in the direction of maintaining a minima 346-ship US Navy, not the present 284 size , nor a smaller potens 285-ship Navy under proposed USDOD cuts.

IIUC ARTIC = ANYTHING LESS THAN A 346-SHIP US NAVY MEANS THAT THE US MAY NOT BE ABLE IN TIME TO RESIST THE STEADY RISE OF CHINA'S PLAN, ETC.
TO ITS DETRIMENT.

SUB-IIUC, STRONGER CHINA PLA, WEAKER USDOD = THE US IN FUTURE WILL NEED A NEW FALLBACK PLAN TOWARDS HAWAII + US WEST COAST.

[Once again, US ISLAND-DESTROYING/SINKING
"EARTHQUAKE BOMBS" = HUGO CHAVEZ here].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-01-06 20:31  

#7  After the real cuts come and benefits are also cut for the military guess those employment numbers will be looking real good huh?
Posted by: Pearl Hupeter3505   2012-01-06 16:12  

#6  Frankly, US troops shouldn't be doing street policing in IED traps. Massive disproportionate retaliation is the only thing that ever works with slaves of allah. They kill 1, we kill 100. Yah, I have heard of Lidice. We kill for everything that's good and decent in the world.
Posted by: Elmaimp the Batty1777   2012-01-06 15:16  

#5  P2K that would require the Stupid Party to not be so.
Posted by: Hellfish   2012-01-06 10:38  

#4  Yes, but...
The Trunks should use the proposed personnel cuts to hammer the Donks who played up the rotation policies and its stress decrying that we didn't have enough boots to meet the mission in the 'stans and Iraq. Hammer'em for the political posturing, hammer'em for the hypocrisy, hammer'em for the duplicity.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-01-06 09:25  

#3  I don't think this is quite as dire as some other Rantburgers.

Back in 2000, the DOD budget was about $300B (all $ are current $). That was post Cold War against Communism, pre Long War against Islamism (at least before we realized we were in a Long War and, yes, some people still deny the latter).

In 2009 we were at about $650B with about $150B for Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2011 it was about $740B.

The cuts amount to about $50B/yr against projected.

Posted by: Lord Garth   2012-01-06 09:13  

#2  "...the most expensive thing in the world is a second-best military establishment, good but not good enough to win." -- Robert A. Heinlein
Posted by: Formerly Dan   2012-01-06 08:10  

#1  Obama was deeply involved in the strategy review

Well...doesn't that make me feel better.
Posted by: tu3031   2012-01-06 00:11  

00:00