| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Louisiana Sues Census Bureau Over Policy Of Counting Illegal Aliens For Apportionment |
| 2012-01-17 |
| Judicial Watch, the organization that investigates and fights government corruption, announced today that it filed an amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the State of Louisiana challenging a current federal policy in which “unlawfully present aliens” were counted in the 2010 Census (Louisiana v. Bryson). The government used these census numbers to reapportion seats in the House of Representatives and, as a result, the State of Louisiana lost a House seat to which it was entitled. Louisiana is asking that the Supreme Court order the federal government to recalculate the 2010 apportionment of House seats based upon legal residents as the U.S. Constitution requires. Judicial Watch’s brief was filed on January 13, 2012, in partnership with the Allied Educational Foundation (AEF) in a lawsuit filed by the State of Louisiana against John Bryson, U.S. Secretary of Commerce; Robert Groves, Director of the U.S. Census Bureau; and Karen Lehman Hass, Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives. According to the brief: Amici are concerned about the failure to enforce the nation’s immigration laws and the corrosive effect of this failure on our institutions and the rule of law. Among the problems caused by this failure is a redistribution of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives to States with large populations of unlawfully present aliens. Judicial Watch argues that due to this Census Bureau policy at least five states will lose House seats to which they are entitled. For example, based upon the Census Bureau’s calculation, Louisiana is being allocated only six House seats, as opposed to the seven that it would have been apportioned, were it not for the inclusion of illegal aliens and “non-immigrant foreign nationals,” encompassing holders of student visas and guest workers. The brief also notes that the “apportionment, in turn, determines the apportionment of electors in the Electoral College for the next three presidential elections.” It is the contention of the State of Louisiana, Judicial Watch and AEF that “the policy of counting unlawfully present aliens in the nation’s decennial census is unconstitutional and undermines both our federal system of government and our democratic institutions,” and is the “direct result of the failure to enforce our nation’s immigration laws.” “The U.S. Census Bureau’s policy of counting illegal aliens is unconstitutional and it distorts the democratic process,” said Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch. “Moreover, the Obama administration’s hostility to enforcing illegal immigration laws will only make this problem worse as greater numbers of illegal aliens flood into the country. Judicial Watch is pleased to join with the Allied Educational Foundation to file this amicus curiae brief in support of the State of Louisiana and the rule of law. We hope the Supreme Court takes up this historic case and vindicates the right of American citizens to have full representation in Washington.” |
| Posted by:Anonymoose |
| #4 slaves were not citizens of another country. They were property til freed. |
| Posted by: Frank G 2012-01-17 19:54 |
| #3 Slaves couldn't vote but they still got (partially) counted for representative apportionment; sounds pretty similar to counting illegals for apportionment. |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2012-01-17 19:41 |
| #2 How conservative is Louisiana? Bobby Jindal's entire re-election campaign consisted of him posing with the president of the NRA in his TV spots. (And he won by a landslide.) Clearly folks like us can't be trusted with seats in Congress. |
| Posted by: Matt 2012-01-17 19:28 |
| #1 since the purpose is to elect representatives of citizens and voters, not non-citizens and non-voters, their argument should carry the win. The fact that it would at best be 5-4 is another reason to vote for anybody but Obama |
| Posted by: Frank G 2012-01-17 18:40 |