You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Pentagon Overtakes State Department on Security Aid
2012-01-27
The current Defense Department budget again makes the DOD the premier funder of security assistance to foreign countries, giving it more than double the comparable budget of the agency popularly associated with AmericaÂ’s foreign aid, the State Department.

The $17 billion Pentagon aid budget for the 2012 fiscal year is the second in a row to exceed the State DepartmentÂ’s by $10 billion, a disparity that has begun to provoke debate among foreign policy experts in Washington. Seven years ago, circumstances were reversed, with the State Department spending triple the amount the Pentagon spent on such aid.

Some foreign aid experts have complained that, as a result of the shifting responsibilities, U.S. aid priorities have shifted from trying to establish good governance to supporting stronger foreign military partners.

Defense-funded security assistance programs, like those funded directly by the State Department, include military and police training, counter-drug assistance, counterterrorism activities, and infrastructure projects. These programs, detailed in the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act, have been steadily expanding, according to a March 2011 report by the Stimson Center, a nonprofit policy research group in Washington.

The expansion has largely come at the expense of the authority of the State Department, which was long chiefly responsible for the planning, budgeting and oversight of security assistance—including military training—with the Department of Defense responsible for implementation. After 9/11, the Pentagon has assumed more authority in foreign aid budgeting and planning.
Posted by:tipper

#4  Beware of "functionaries" bearing "process..."
Posted by: M. Murcek   2012-01-27 13:01  

#3  They lost a lot of credibility over their 'work' in Iraq and didn't improve their track record any in Afghanistan. And perhaps the DOD's more effective at spending funds as they're intended.
Posted by: Pappy   2012-01-27 11:50  

#2  Maybe we should just save some money and grief by getting rid of the DoS.
Posted by: gorb   2012-01-27 08:49  

#1  Maybe the ineffectiveness of State in executing its part of the mission [if not interference] in Iraq has resulted in a reality check on who one can count on. There's an observed principle in action - important work flows towards competency.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-01-27 08:33  

00:00