You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Manning's treatment was cruel and inhuman, UN torture chief whines
2012-03-13
Bradley, not Peyton.
The UN special rapper rapporteur on torture has formally accused the US government of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment towards Bradley Manning, the US soldier who was held in solitary confinement for almost a year on suspicion of being the WikiLeaks source.

Juan Mendez has completed a 14-month investigation into the treatment of Manning since the soldier's arrest at a US military base in May 2010. He concludes that the US military was at least culpable of cruel and inhumane treatment in keeping Manning locked up alone for 23 hours a day over an 11-month period in conditions that he also found might have constituted torture.
He was locked up in solitary to keep him from passing messages to others, which he had said he was going to do.
"The special rapporteur concludes that imposing seriously punitive conditions of detention on someone who has not been found guilty of any crime is a violation of his right to physical and psychological integrity as well as of his presumption of innocence," Mendez writes.
Isn't there someone in solitary in Chechnya or Tehran you could focus on? No?
The findings of cruel and inhuman treatment are published as an addendum to the special rapporteur's report to the UN general assembly on the promotion and protection of human rights. They are likely to reignite criticism of the US government's harsh treatment of Manning ahead of his court martial later this year.

Manning, 24, was arrested on May 29 2010 at the Forward Operating Base Hammer outside Baghdad, where he was working as an intelligence analyst. Manning has been charged with 22 counts, including aiding the enemy, relating to the leaking a massive trove of state secrets to the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks.

Mendez, who runs the UN office that investigates incidents of alleged torture around the world, told the Guardian: "I conclude that the 11 months under conditions of solitary confinement (regardless of the name given to his regime by the prison authorities) constitutes at a minimum cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment in violation of article 16 of the convention against torture. If the effects in regards to pain and suffering inflicted on Manning were more severe, they could constitute torture."

Manning was initially held for almost three months at Camp Arifjan in Kuwait, and then transferred in July 2010 to the Marine corps base at Quantico in Virginia. He was held there for another eight months in conditions that aroused widespread condemnation, including being held in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day and being made to strip naked at night.
Because he had threatened to hang himself with his jammies.
In his opening letter to the US government on December 30 2010, Mendez said that the prolonged period of isolated confinment was believed to have been imposed "in an effort to coerce him into 'cooperation' with the authorities, allegedly for the purpose of persuading him to implicate others."
Also keep him from offing himself, but the special rapper somehow never mentions that, even though it was made clear and public at the time.
The US mission to the UN in Geneva responded to Mendez on January 27 2011. It said that the US government "is committed to protecting human rights in our country and abroad, and we value the work of the special rapporteur".
Even when we laugh behind his back...
In a later letter, dated May 19 2011, the Pentagon's legal counsel told Mendez that it was satisfied that Manning's treatment at Quantico had been fine. "Though Private Manning was classified as a maximum custody detainee at Quantico, he occupied the very same type of single-occupancy cell that all other pretrial detainees occupied."

But the Pentagon's arguments did not impress the special rapporteur.
No, of course not...
He stressed in his final conclusions that "solitary confinement is a harsh measure which may cause serious psychological and physiological adverse effects on individuals regardless of their specific conditions."
The key word here is 'may'...
Moreover, "[d]epending on the specific reason for its application, conditions, length, effects and other circumstances, solitary confinement can amount to a breach of article seven of the international covenant on civil and political rights, and to an act defined in article one or article 16 of the convention against torture."
Depending on the 'specific reason'? Suppose we had let Mr. Manning keep his jambes and he indeed contrived to hang himself? Who would believe the jailers, the warden and the government that it was a suicide?
He also said that the US government had tried to justify Manning's solitary confinement by calling it "prevention of harm watch". Yet the military had offered no details as to what actual harm was being prevented.
Suicide. What more detail do you need?
Mendez told the Guardian that he could not reach a definitive conclusion on whether Manning had been tortured because he has consistently been denied permission by the US military to interview the prisoner under acceptable circumstances.
Ah, 'acceptable circumstances': a café in Paris?
The Pentagon has refused to allow Mendez to see Manning in private, insisting that all conversations must be monitored. "You should have no expectation of privacy in your communications with Private Manning," the Pentagon wrote.
Because we don't want Manning passing messages.
The lack of privacy is a violation of human rights procedures, the UN says, and considered unacceptable by the UN special rapporteur.
So I guess you won't be talking to him.
Manning's travails in solitary confinement came to an end on April 20 2011 when he was transferred from Quantico to Fort Leavenworth in Kansas, where he was held in more open conditions. He is currently being held in a facility in Virginia so that he can make frequent pre-trial appearances at Fort Meade in Maryland ahead of his eventual court martial.
Posted by:Steve White

#10  Suppose the fellow who shot the 16 Afghanis went through the exact same treatment that Bradley Manning did - several months in solitary confinement, etc.

I wonder if the UN special rapper would issue a special report on his treatment being inhumane and torture.

I didn't think so.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2012-03-13 19:22  

#9  I know there were some pissed off Boston fans, but I guess some people really hate the Giants.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2012-03-13 16:45  

#8  I have a feeling that Private Manning's "big adventure" is just beginning. Once in the caring arms of the administrative NCOs at Ft. Leavenworth, wearing his newly ironed, brightly colored jumpsuit, it will be like he is back in basic training again. Sort of.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2012-03-13 15:57  

#7  Why do we still fund these sycophants?
Posted by: DarthVader   2012-03-13 12:12  

#6  Does this mean we finally qualify to join the U.N. Commission on [Abusing] Human Rights?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2012-03-13 11:23  

#5  Only one message for UN pukes who try and get involved in internal military matters: piss off.
Posted by: mojo   2012-03-13 10:54  

#4  Bradley, not Peyton.

Damnit, I was gonna make that joke...
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2012-03-13 10:30  

#3  "And the horse you rode in on, bub"

Could not have said it more eloquently myself.

Sums up my sentiments.

This little twerp should have been tried by a court martial a year ago and shot...why does it take so long to get a guy in front of a Colonel these days?
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2012-03-13 10:17  

#2  I thought what the Irsay's did moving the Colts out of Baltimore was much worse.
Posted by: Beavis   2012-03-13 10:10  

#1  ...and the horse you rode in on, bub.
Posted by: tu3031   2012-03-13 10:00  

00:00