You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka should reconcile with Tamils: US
2012-03-14
WASHINGTON — The United States said Tuesday that unless Sri Lanka’s government reconciles with minority Tamils and addresses allegations of war crimes it risks renewed conflict.
Because it's incumbent on the winners of a brutal civil war to make nice with the bloodthirsty losers...
The U.S. has introduced a draft resolution at the discredited U.N. Human Rights Council, increasing international pressure on Sri Lanka to conduct an independent investigation. The council in Geneva is expected to vote next week on the resolution that stops short of demanding an outside probe, but has angered Sri Lanka, which claims it could stir separatism.
They'd be correct. I'm sure there are a few remnants of the Tigers who would be happy to restart the fighting.
Robert Blake, assistant secretary of state for South and Central Asia, said that accountability and reconciliation was in Sri Lanka’s best interests, so “they really can achieve peace and security and not sow anger in their own community that could give rise to new violence.”
Accountability for the Tigers would be a useful experience. The Tamil people could then see how they were led astray. Reconciliation by the Tamil people would be helpful -- they could for example pledge to be Sri Lankan citizens and drop demands for a separate state.
“Experience in many civil conflicts around the world has shown that countries that don’t take adequate measures to address reconciliation and accountability frequently experience a regeneration of the insurgency that they faced,” he told The Associated Press. “We could see very much that similar situation in Sri Lanka.”
Quiet diplomacy is more likely to get the Sinhalese to take some steps at reconciliation. Rubbing their faces in a UNHCR resolution simply won't work; it's the whole loss-of-face issue common to Asia.
The resolution calls on Sri Lanka to investigate allegations of human rights abuses by both the government troops and Tamil Tiger rebels in the final months of the quarter-century war, and implement recommendations of its own reconciliation panel. A U.N panel of experts reported in 2011 that tens of thousands of people may have been killed, largely through shell fire by the government troops.

Sri LankaÂ’s government, which has defended its conduct of the war as protecting Tamil civilians, has organized a series of protests against the resolution, calling it interference in its affairs.

In Colombo on Tuesday, Housing Minister Wimal Weerawansa called for a boycott of U.S. products. He told a protest meeting that the resolution amounts to calling for the revival of the Tamil Tigers.

Eileen Donahoe, U.S. ambassador to the Human Rights Council, said Sri Lanka had reacted “very negatively” to the resolution and has fought it “tooth and nail” but she expected it to pass.

“We had intended it in a fairly cooperative spirit,” she said. “We were very forward leaning in our effort to reach out to the Sri Lankans.”
Then shut up and do your work behind the scenes. This is way too public.
She said an earlier version of the resolution had sought an action plan from Sri Lanka by June, but as tabled now, the resolution calls for the U.N. Human Rights Commissioner to report to the council a year from now on the steps Sri Lanka has taken.

Blake said the resolution would not be weakened further.

Despite the strain on U.S.-Sri Lanka relations, Donahoe said Colombo was keeping open its channels of communication with Washington, and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has invited Sri Lanka Foreign Minister G.L. Peiris for talks in Washington in April.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  >>>Name one ethnic group, that is better off now, having their own little enclave, than they were when they were forced to function in an overall society.
Posted by Bill Clinton

Estonia; much better off. But having more than one independence day is a headache.
Posted by: Mizzou Mafia   2012-03-14 17:09  

#6  Name one ethnic group, that is better off now, having their own little enclave, than they were when they were forced to function in an overall society

Israel. But that's a special case, and the Jews were generally good citizens to begin with, not violent rebels.
Posted by: trailing wife   2012-03-14 13:44  

#5  Robert E. Lee's noble act at Appomattox.
Posted by: Eric Jablow   2012-03-14 12:09  

#4  I think the left's model of a fractured society of separate sniveling whiney assed minorities and ethnic groups squabbling amoungst themselves so that the oligarchy can manipulate them or divert their attention from the gross misguided and corrupt leadership.

I find it funny there was no mention of the horrendous and ghastly brutality of the Tamils toward the other ethnic groups in Sri Lanka and India. Remember the Tigers assassinated Ghandi junior when he was running for the Presidency of India.

Screw the tigers and a separate state for any of them. Ethnicity and little ghettoes full of unemployed, disgruntled and volatile ethnic groups that refuse to mainstream in the society as a whole are the source of most of our socila problems here and most everywhere else in the world. When a strong government drives a boot up the ass of the sniveling ethnic groups and makes them get along, society as a whole and the individual ethnic groups are better off.

Name one ethnic group, that is better off now, having their own little enclave, than they were when they were forced to function in an overall society.
Posted by: Bill Clinton   2012-03-14 10:48  

#3  "Experience in many civil conflicts around the world has shown that countries that don't take adequate measures to address reconciliation and accountability frequently experience a regeneration of the insurgency that they faced,"

How about just a 'with malice toward none' press release?

Posted by: Halliburton - Mysterious Conspiracy Division   2012-03-14 10:07  

#2  Because it's incumbent on the winners of a brutal civil war

That's what they object to
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2012-03-14 03:52  

#1  Man, the left is still sore their side lost, aren't they? Remember when Sri Lanka was on Rantburg every day? It's disappeared because there's no more terrorism there.
Posted by: gromky   2012-03-14 02:42  

00:00