Submit your comments on this article | ||
Home Front: WoT | ||
Obama administration urges freer access to cellphone records | ||
2012-05-04 | ||
WASHINGTON - The U.S. Congress should pass a law to give investigators freer access to certain cellphone records, an Obama administration official said on Thursday, in remarks that raised concern among advocates of civil liberties and privacy.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled this year that a warrant was needed to put a GPS satellite tracking device on a suspect's vehicle, prompting questions about other instances where probable-cause warrants should be needed to obtain information in the rapidly changing world of mobile devices. Federal courts around the country are split on whether to require warrants for records of phone usage collected at towers that transmit cellphone signals, Weinstein told a conference. While prosecutors have been told to get warrants to put a tracking device on a vehicle or to track the precise GPS location of a person via their cellphone, they should not be needed to obtain data from the towers, Weinstein said. "There really is no fairness and no justice when the law applies differently to different people depending on which courthouse you're sitting in," he said at the "State of the Mobile Net" conference sponsored by the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee. "For that reason alone, we think Congress should clarify the legal standard," he said. One civil liberties advocate sought to challenge that assertion, saying the Obama administration had made the same argument during the Supreme Court GPS case and it had been soundly rejected. "Not one justice accepted the Department of Justice's argument in that case. It got zero votes," Greg Nojeim, senior counsel at the Center for Democracy and Technology, said during the conference. "We're all here, the criminals are not taking over the country."
Democratic Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon and Republican House of Representatives member Jason Chaffetz of Utah proposed a bill last year trying to detail a legal framework, including requiring a warrant for acquiring location information for a person; however the legislation has not advanced. | ||
Posted by:Steve White |
#8 Disregard "John" at bottom of previous post...Just flotsam from a previously deleted sentence... |
Posted by: canalzone 2012-05-04 23:37 |
#7 JM, "The Searchers" w/John Wayne is an excellent flick, as are almost all of his; with the exception of his last three or four. Those movies are SO entertaining, satisfying and available. Almost everything that Clint Eastwood starred-in or directed will never disappoint (try "The Outlaw Josie Wells")...Those old American West flicks will really draw you in... John |
Posted by: canalzone 2012-05-04 23:32 |
#6 The Govt is already reading, storing, + even modifying, etc. our Personal E-Mails widout our knowledge + consent ["implied consent"], + our Cellphone + ChatRoom, etc. oral conversations. SO LETS "GO FOR BROKE" IN ORDER TO HAVE THAT REAL "D *** NG IT, FORT SUMTER SHOULD BE FIRED UPON" CIVIL WAR INSPIRATION??? * FYI FREEREPUBLIC > NEW US LAW TO SWEEP ACROSS NATION THAT WOULD STRIP ALL AMERICANS OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, ala US Fifth Court shenannigans. Well whaddaya know, its NOT - I repeat, NOT - the US Ninth this time. lol. * "THE SEARCHERS" WARD BOND > D *** NG IT , NOT, NOT - SPELLED K-N-U-T- NOT! |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2012-05-04 23:12 |
#5 Bill,not that there would be anything wrong with that. |
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2012-05-04 22:14 |
#4 newc, If GWB had proposed this Keith Obamamann would have had a hysterical seizure on live tv on PMSNBC... |
Posted by: Bill Clinton 2012-05-04 14:37 |
#3 "We're all here, the criminals are not taking over the country." What are you talking about? You are RUNNING the country. |
Posted by: newc 2012-05-04 12:03 |
#2 George Bush was not shit compared to this klingon. |
Posted by: newc 2012-05-04 12:00 |
#1 Big Brother wants more control? Duh. The mindset of tyrants is ever the same. |
Posted by: AlanC 2012-05-04 09:24 |