| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| IOWAHAWK: DNC Scientists Disprove Existence of Roberts' Taxon |
| 2012-07-07 |
| WASHINGTON DC - Jubilant scientists at the DNC's High Speed Word Collider (HSWC) announced today they have conclusively disproven the existence of Roberts' Taxon, the theoretical radioactive Facton particle that some had worried would lead to the implosion of the entire Universal Health Care System. "I think it's time to pop the champagne corks," said HSWC Director David Plouffe. "Then blaze some choom." The landmark experiment in Quantum Rhetoric began early this week after legal particle cosmologist John Roberts published a paper in the Quarterly Journal of Tortured Logic that solved the long-debated Pelosi's Paradox in Universal Health Care Theory. "Pelosi's Paradox states that in order to find out what is in a health care bill, it would have to be passed," explained physicist Steven Hawking. "But in order to be a law it would have to be constitutional, which means someone would have to know what was in it, which would mean it couldn't have been a bill in the first place. Think of Schroedinger's Cat, except with a lobotomy." To solve the paradox, Roberts proposed the existence of the Taxon - an ephemeral, mysterious facton particle that in theory would allow the Universal Health System to be constitutional, without directly observing what was in it. DNC scientists at first cheered Roberts' findings, but it soon came apparent that it opened an even deadlier dilemma. "If Roberts' Taxon were really to exist, and was woven throughout the Health-Government-Time continuum, the merest realization of it would create a giant black hole in Gallup Space and cause free healthcare reality to collapse upon itself," said Plouffe. In order to disprove the Taxon, scientists at the HSWC devised a test experiment in their enormous CarneyLab bullshit accelerator. This test involved speeding a small mass of Facton - theoretically containing Roberts' Taxon - and smashing it at near-light speed against a flaming super-dense ionized clod of purified bullshit. "It was a complete success," said Plouffe. "The collision produced only inert crap particles like Feesons and Penaltyons, obliterating any traces of a single highly radioactive Taxon. What's more, we were thrilled that it also resulted in over 300 milliaxlerods of of positive Fernstroms." While super high-density bullshit was critical to the experiment, Plouffe said other key variables were necessary to keep potential Taxons from escaping to Gallup Reality Space. "We were careful to shroud the collision within the Beltosphere, which is protected with a thick sheath of inert, pliable media," he noted. "As additional protection, we surrounded it with a negatively-charged gaseous squirrel field." Base on the success of the test, Plouffe said the HSWC would soon begin work on destroying traces of a new deadly Facton particle, the Unemployon. "LOOK, SQUIRREL!" He added. |
| Posted by:Beavis |
| #5 I don't know, I think the Squirrel Field would attack the HSWC, causing the creation of Conservatons. Afterall, we all know you can't trust Squirrels. |
| Posted by: Charles 2012-07-07 20:26 |
| #4 Roberts' opinion in short: |Obamacare> = (|Tax> + |Penalty>) / sqrt(2) |
| Posted by: Solomon Prince of the Welsh9352 2012-07-07 18:27 |
| #3 go to the link for a great accompanying graphic |
| Posted by: Frank G 2012-07-07 14:52 |
| #2 "It was a complete success," said Plouffe. "The collision produced only inert crap particles like Feesons and Penaltyons "Penaltyons" ...... a most interesting word. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2012-07-07 14:00 |
| #1 You will be taxed as a state for not participating in No Child Left Behind. A thought the other day. Yes, we light some fireworks but the big deal this year was teaching my daughter about what Independence is, and I think it took. Taught others in the family coming up on teens. So I take a minute to chuckle at the very witty and quite right Iowahawk. Back to work. Go State. I do not see how if the Fed refuses to enforce Fed law in State, then why should the State enforce Fed law? No, not talking immigration or choom laws, talking taxes. |
| Posted by: swksvolFF 2012-07-07 13:56 |