| Submit your comments on this article | |
| -Election 2012 | |
| America: This time, itÂ’s personal | |
| 2012-07-10 | |
| |
| Posted by: |
| #6 ...The election will be won by which ever candidate can run closest to the center without losing his base. It will make zero difference how conservitive Romney is or isn't, if he doesn't win the election. and yup. In which case I have a couple links for y'all to consider: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colchicine. Also, related... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drug_Price_Competition_and_Patent_Term_Restoration_Act, also commonly known as the Hatch/Waxman Act. Interesting name, huh? |
| Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2012-07-10 21:28 |
| #5 conservatives simply can’t make of Romney a “what we believe in” choice. He is instead a “prudent tactics” choice: a placeholder who will basically not be Obama for the next four years. That seems to sum up where we are. Romney is not Obama. Romney appears to be a fairly decent man. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2012-07-10 17:30 |
| #4 But it does mean that the public is inured to the Obama shtick. Does inured mean fed up with the BS and prevarications? |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2012-07-10 17:21 |
| #3 yup. |
| Posted by: lotp 2012-07-10 17:16 |
| #2 The election will be won by which ever candidate can run closest to the center without losing his base. It will make zero difference how conservitive Romney is or isn't, if he doesn't win the election. |
| Posted by: junkiron 2012-07-10 12:12 |
| #1 I keep telling Trunk acquaintances that the day after Romney is elected to go down and register as an independent. Enough Trunks do that and the Beltway Party can't assume they'll be around in two years after forcing us to eat the crap they do to us for 'bi-partisanship'. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2012-07-10 09:15 |