Submit your comments on this article |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
US federal appeals court reopens old 'Troubles' in Northern Ireland |
2012-07-16 |
![]() The July 6 ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit results from Boston College researchers attempts to block two sets of subpoenas issued by the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI). The PSNI wants access to the testimonies in order to pursue prosecutions for unsolved crimes -- in this case one of the most unsettling of the murky 30-year war: the abduction and secret killing of Jean McConville. McConville, a Catholic convert and mother of 10, lived in West Belfast, ground zero for the early years of the conflict. In 1972 she was abducted and killed by the IRA. She subsequently became the best-known of "the disappeared," those believed to have been killed by the IRA in secret because it was feared that revulsion at their killing would have turned nationalists and republicans against the organization. The IRA admitted responsibility for the killing in 1999, but claimed McConville was a spy, which her family denies. Her body was recovered in 2003. The case at issue centers on the testimony of former IRA member Dolours Price, whose interview, police allege, may contain information about the circumstances surrounding Mrs. McConville's murder. Speculation is running wild that Ms. Price's testimony will link Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams to the killing, which, if true, could prove explosive to Northern Ireland's long-standing yet fragile peace accord and power-sharing government. Ironically, all sides want the truth to be told -- the question is when, under what circumstances, and if it will be the full historical record. After the court ruling, the material is expected to be handed over by Boston College in the next month. Boston College is separately appealing the order enforcing one of the sets of subpoenas. |
Posted by:Pappy |
#12 Whichever way it goes, I'd like to see how this gets resolved constitutionally. Interesting situation from a legal standpoint. How the IRA (and I have ancestors in that organization) squares killing a mother of 10 is far beyond me. Evil. |
Posted by: Broadhead6 2012-07-16 20:58 |
#11 So if one admits a felonious act to an egghead professor, the professor thinks that there is some kind of "privilege" attached to the admission? Nah come on. They live in their own world sometimes. Now how a North Ireland subpeona is enforcable in Boston is perhaps another question. Oh ya - Irish cops and Irish cops -I forgot. |
Posted by: Northern Cousin 2012-07-16 16:30 |
#10 Trust me, if they didn't give a ####, that would be a marked improvement over the truth. |
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain 2012-07-16 15:29 |
#9 supported by the likes of Ed Kennedy & Co. Because Kennedy, like most lefties, don't giva a $hit about the little people if it can wax their political image. (See Also Fast & Furious and drone attacks) |
Posted by: AlanC 2012-07-16 15:23 |
#8 They are gangsters who made money through extortion, protection rackets, gambling, prostitution etc. Fuel and arms smuggling,drug and immigrant running, technical support and training to groups in South America and other regions... |
Posted by: Pappy 2012-07-16 14:45 |
#7 The phrase "bloody provos" pretty much covers it. |
Posted by: mojo 2012-07-16 14:15 |
#6 McGuiness and Adams have alot of blood on their hands.I never worked out why they were supported by the likes of Ed Kennedy & Co. They are gangsters who made money through extortion,protection rackets,gambling,prostitution etc.Seen as the Mafia in many peoples eyes who live in Northern Ireland. |
Posted by: Angeamp Turkeyneck4941 2012-07-16 12:44 |
#5 Done as requested, Besoeker. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2012-07-16 05:04 |
#4 Refreshing, common sense decision I'd say. (Mods, please favour me with the removal of the incorrect 'line through' if you would. Thanks in advance. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2012-07-16 03:06 |
#3 In her ruling chief, 1st Circuit Chief Judge Sandra Lynch nixed Moloney and McIntyre's claim of academic research privilege as a constitutional exercise of freedom of speech, saying "the choice to investigate criminal activity belongs to the government and is not subject to veto by academic researchers Refreshing, common sense decision I'd say. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2012-07-16 03:05 |
#2 That's REALLY sucking in the 70s. |
Posted by: Perfesser 2012-07-16 02:59 |
#1 So Gerry may not be pure as the driven snow, eh? Well that's a shocker... |
Posted by: tu3031 2012-07-16 01:05 |