You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Bay Area faces new high-speed rail costs
2012-07-24
[] Now that Gov. Jerry Brown has signed legislation to allow the state to spend billions on high-speed rail, Bay Area residents had better brace for the real ride - a push for $650 million in toll hikes and new San Francisco taxes.

That's how much will be needed to help pay for a tunnel to connect the Transbay Terminal to the Caltrain station at Fourth and King streets.

As it turns out, none of the $2.5 billion in tunnel costs were included as part of the narrowly approved high-speed-rail deal.

It's up to the locals to make the tunnel happen. If they don't, the $68 billion high-speed-rail line from Los Angeles will dead-end several blocks from downtown proper.

Building the tunnel will put San Francisco in competition with those hoping to finish BART to San Jose - both projects will be tussling for $1.8 billion that the federal government will direct to the Bay Area in the coming years.

Just for work to start on the 1.2-mile dig through the heart of the city, however, the Bay Area has to come up with its own $650 million. The current plan is to raise $300 million from higher bridge tolls and $350 million in San Francisco sales-tax dollars.

"That's a reasonable estimation," said spokesman Randy Rentschler of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

José Luis Moscovich, executive director of the San Francisco County Transportation Authority, said city voters could be asked for the $350 million as part of an overall transportation-tax extension within the next two years.

The date for when the Legislature and voters would be asked to approve another $1 toll hike to raise the $300 million in tunnel money is a bit more elusive. Although acknowledging that toll money would be needed for a San Francisco tunnel, Rentschler says there are no plans on the boards to seek an increase.

Even if all the money does come through and the tunnel gets dug, High-Speed Rail Authority boss Dan Richard says, the bullet train won't arrive in San Francisco until 2028 or so. Until then, the tunnel would be used only by Caltrain.
Posted by:Fred

#11  Is it just me, or is anyone else suddenly seeing the Roosevelt-era WPA = WORK PROGRESS ADMINISTRATION [revamped]???

Starting wid the Congresscritters proposed new National Urban Renewal programme ala 2020???

Given the anti-US Globalists/OWG'ers, + current + forecasted/anticipated state of the US-World Economy, I'm not sure iff this is good news or bad news - THE MIGHTY "MAYBE" STRIKES???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-07-24 19:55  

#10  
Posted by: junkiron   2012-07-24 16:17  

#9  What is that pic, Fee's Company?

You have not yet begun to find unaccounted, unexpected expenses. In fact, I have a box of doughnuts which says this is a farce to raise a bunch of taxes only to have the project cancelled in five years and the various levies stay put.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2012-07-24 13:06  

#8  And a dumb design. If they're going to all that trouble, why not go to Market and link up with BART and Muni? Or buy Google buses to run a free shuttle between the three locations. Probably the cheapest and best solution.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2012-07-24 12:38  

#7  A map showing both the Caltrans Station and Transbay terminal is here.

The tunnel would be about 1.3 miles. The current cost of $650M is probably low by a factor of 2 or 3 given the usual bells and whistles that will be added to concept as it stands now.

In the meantime, this area of SF is thought to be a hot redevelopment area with high rises, hotels, retail, residential, etc. planned. These would, in theory, generate in the vicinity of $40M in tax revenues annually. However, with the California fiscal situation as bad as it is, I don't see the redevelopment happening any time soon.
Posted by: lord garth   2012-07-24 10:23  

#6  Even if all the money does come through and the tunnel gets dug, High-Speed Rail Authority boss Dan Richard says, the bullet train won't arrive in San Francisco until 2028

Another Social Security style Ponzi Scheme for the politicians to loot for other 'needs' before the delivery date.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-07-24 10:05  

#5  Ditto Besoeker.

I had the same thought, you put it more elegantly.
Posted by: AlanC   2012-07-24 09:43  

#4  Stupid idiots.
Posted by: newc   2012-07-24 09:07  

#3  The Gods of San Andreas smile and nod their collective approval.
Posted by: Besoeker   2012-07-24 04:16  

#2  I can hear it now...

"You mean we have to PAY for it?"
Posted by: CrazyFool   2012-07-24 00:54  

#1  Three words, San Franciscans - "Boston's Big Dig".
Posted by: Raj   2012-07-24 00:53  

00:00