You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
The New York Times Co. Posts a Loss
2012-07-27
The New York Times Company reported a second-quarter loss on Thursday because of a write-down in the value of About.com and continuing declines in print and digital advertising revenue. The net loss was $88.1 million, or 60 cents a share, compared with a net loss of $119.7 million, or 79 cents a share, in the period a year earlier, when the company wrote down the value of its regional newspapers, which it later sold.

Increases in circulation and digital subscriptions contributed to a 0.6 percent increase in revenue, to $515.2 million. But a $194.7 million write-down of About.com, the online resource guide the company bought in 2005, weighed on profits. The Times Company had an operating loss of $143.6 million in the quarter ended June 24, compared with an operating profit of $31.5 million in the period a year earlier.

Shares rose more than 11 percent, to $7.87, in morning trading.
So they lost money and the shares went up. That makes sense in a progressive world...
Advertising revenue at the companyÂ’s News Media Group, which includes The Times, The International Herald Tribune and The Boston Globe, fell 6.6 percent, to $220 million. Print advertising revenue fell 8 percent, in part because of continued weakness in real estate advertising. Online ad revenue at the news media group decreased 1.6 percent, to $52.6 million, despite a push in video and other efforts to bring in new advertisers to NYTimes.com.

Circulation revenue at the News Media Group rose 8.3 percent, to $233 million, in part because of a price increase in home-delivery subscriptions and single-copy sales of The Times put in place last January and the continued growth of online subscription plans. In March the company adopted a new approach to the year-old online subscription program that paid off in the second quarter. Readers must now pay to access NYTimes.com after reading 10 free articles a month, down from a threshold of 20 free articles that was established when the subscription program was first introduced.

Paid digital subscribers to the Web site, e-reader and other digital editions of The Times and The Herald Tribune were up 12 percent, to 509,000, at the end of the second quarter from 454,000 in March. Paid subscribers to The GlobeÂ’s e-reader and replica editions and BostonGlobe.com were up about 28 percent, to 23,000 subscribers.

Digital subscriptions have helped circulation revenue at The Times and Herald Tribune surpass advertising revenue. The newspapers had combined circulation revenue of $194 million, compared with advertising revenue of $171 million.
Posted by:Steve White

#9  Losses must be driven by declining Bird ownership in city residences.

How much money does it cost to print a fax or email from the whitehouse each morning?
Posted by: airandee   2012-07-27 18:53  

#8  "we lose money on everything we sell, but we make up for it in volume"

Losing money on real news ...
so making it up on false reporting??
Hahahahaha !!!
Posted by: Raider   2012-07-27 15:53  

#7  Not surprising since they don't sell what they say they are selling--the news. Buyer beware.
Posted by: JohnQC   2012-07-27 14:41  

#6  The only reasons shares might go up is (a) liberals want to support their paper so they are willing to throw money away (b) people believe Sorros or someone will buy them out because they are useful to legitimize propoganda.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2012-07-27 14:34  

#5  ...its why they don't understand free markets and embrace state owned and operated central planning markets.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2012-07-27 08:45  

#4  Makes it easy to see why they tout the failed political and economic theories that they so love. It's all of a piece with their business model.
Posted by: M. Murcek   2012-07-27 08:03  

#3  "we lose money on everything we sell, but we make up for it in volume"
Posted by: Frank G   2012-07-27 07:42  

#2  /s (in case it's needed)
Posted by: tipover   2012-07-27 00:32  

#1  They did? Really?
Posted by: tipover   2012-07-27 00:31  

00:00