| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Culture Wars |
| Arizona Court: Public Office Requires English Proficiency |
| 2012-08-18 |
| The Arizona Supreme Court on Friday upheld a state law that requires elected officials to be able to read, write and speak the English language. The state’s top court, in affirming a lower court’s ruling, said the long-standing language requirement “manifests a legitimate concern that those who hold elective office be minimally proficient in English in order to conduct the duties of their office without the aid of an interpreter.” The court rejected an argument that a lower court’s interpretation of the law violates the right to participate in government, with the high court holding that there is no constitutional right to seek office. The state law requiring English proficiency as a qualification for public office has existed since before statehood, the opinion said. “Such a requirement helps ensure that the public officer will in fact be able to understand and perform the functions of the office, including communications with English-speaking constituents and the public,” Justice Robert Brutinel wrote in the opinion. The case came about when the mayor of the city of San Luis sought to disqualify a candidate for city council on the grounds that she could not read, write and speak the English language as required by the law. The lower court conducted a hearing and decided to preclude her from the ballot. The candidate contended that she met the state’s requirements and appealed to the state supreme court. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #3 IIRC all the parties (Mayor, Council, Candidate) were hispanic. Some were just TOO hispanic |
| Posted by: Frank G 2012-08-18 18:58 |
| #2 Raj, the simple fact of bringing the suit means that it has been dnounced as both so the court upholding the law (what a concept) doesn't change anything. |
| Posted by: AlanC 2012-08-18 14:50 |
| #1 How soon does this get denounced as racist, nativist, or both? |
| Posted by: Raj 2012-08-18 14:03 |