You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
China Opposed to Extending S.Korea's Missile Range
2012-09-07
China is apparently opposed to extending the range and payload of South Korean missiles, as is Japan. Opposition from the two neighbors could prove the final stumbling block in negotiations with the U.S about increasing the range and payload, which are restricted under a bilateral agreement.

Concerned that southwestern Japan could fall within the reach of South Korean missiles, Japan has been stepping up opposition to extending their range since President Lee Myung-bak's visit to Dokdo last month.
Not that the Koreans have any intention of attacking the Japanese, never mind the past hundred years of history...
Since the negotiations between South Korea and the U.S. began in January of 2011, Washington has cited concerns from China and Japan as the main reason for maintaining the current cap, which limits the range to 300 km and payload to 500 kg. Seoul wants to extend the range to 1,000 km and the payload to 1 ton.

China is closely watching the negotiations, according to one expert at a state-run think tank. "The Chinese Foreign Ministry, Defense Ministry and Communist Party all feel uneasy about extending the range of South Korean missiles to almost 1,000 km, since Beijing is only 950 km from Seoul," the expert said.

Chinese Defense Minister Liang Guanglie and other top brass there view any extension of South Korea's missile range as part of a U.S. strategy using regional allies to keep China in check.
There is that. Of course if the Chinese would curb the North Koreans I'm sure we could use our vast influence on the ROK...
"China will select new leaders in October and does not want to hear news about strengthened South Korean missile capabilities at a time of leadership change," said another expert. Beijing is apparently concerned that an extension would agitate North Korea, increasing tension in the entire region.
Everything agitates the Norks...
But both China and Japan have the capacity to build intercontinental ballistic missiles, so critics say they are in no position to oppose increasing South Korea's capacity. China's DF-21C missile has a range of 2,500 km, while the DF-31A can travel more than 10,000 km. Japan, meanwhile, has a three-stage, solid-fuel rocket that can be turned into an ICBM. "China and Japan do not want South Korea's military status to rise," said one diplomatic source here.

Meanwhile, Seoul and Washington have apparently narrowed their differences in the talks, which have been going on for the last 21 months. It now seems likely that South Korea will be able to extend the range of missiles to around 800 km and the payload to over 500 kg.

But the U.S. is still apparently opposed to South Korea using solid-fuel boosters. Such rockets are stronger and require less time to prepare for launch. Also, Washington apparently does not want Seoul to transform civilian rockets for missile use or vice versa. The two sides are hoping to wrap up the talks this month. "The time has come for the U.S. to decide," said a high-ranking Defense Ministry official here.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  WORLD NEWS > [Xinhua.net = KCNA] DPRK URGES AMERICAN FORCES TO WITHDRAW FROM SOUTH KOREA, lest NoKor be forced to improve + expand its nuclear deterrent.

China has slammed Japan's plans to finalize its purchase + nationalization of the China-claimed Senkakus/Daoyus + warns that it will to defend its sovereignty rmains unwavering.

IMO "Pudgy" = Jong-un is engaging in good PCorrectness + being double-ended here - the DPRK warning is good for purposes of inter-Korean Reunification + Bilateralism, while also indirectly warning the ROK + US-Allies that China's entrenchment in the East, South China Seas as per disputed islands is very real + very dangerous. UNLIKE IRAN + FAR-AWAY PERSIAN GULF, NE ASIA = "PERFECT STORM" OF MILPOL CRISES VERY CLOSE TO THE BORDERS OF MAJOR WORLD POWERS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-09-07 23:09  

#2  America has been trying to figure out a way to deploy "prompt global strike" systems to take out bin-laden and similar fleeting targets.

Such a system would be a conventional weapon on an ICBM platform.

The US cannot do this, because the target would never know if they were about to get nuked or not, and would have to launch prior to the US missile impacting.

South Korea, however, has no nukes. Thus everyone can be assured that its ICBMs would only be conventional systems. Therefore, the US should sell South Korea ICBMs and share terrorist targeting info with them.

If China doesn't like this plan, well then they can do something about the Norks. Otherwise ...
Posted by: rammer   2012-09-07 21:17  

#1  Guess they'll have to go to North Korea for their missiles.
Posted by: Skidmark   2012-09-07 12:25  

00:00