Submit your comments on this article |
Europe |
'Perverse, ludicrous' verdicts lead to resignations of scientists |
2012-10-24 |
Posted by:Anguper Hupomosing9418 |
#9 It is a terrible verdict, and a terrible prosecution, but in your heart of hearts, don't you wish even a teensy weens bit that Obama's economists who assured that the stimulus would keep unemployment below 8 percent were next? |
Posted by: Perfesser 2012-10-24 20:46 |
#8 I could give you my best guess, but if I'm wrong - and odds are real high I would be - I get sued or jailed, so make your own guess. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2012-10-24 19:28 |
#7 Glen more, that is all well and good... But when do i buy the soup... |
Posted by: Shipman 2012-10-24 19:02 |
#6 I'm a professional geophysicist - don't try this at home. My prediction: If you are near a known fault there will be an earthquake; if you are not near a known fault there will be an earthquake; the only difference is probabilities. Probabilities are just statistical variation around the unknowable answer. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2012-10-24 18:46 |
#5 i think they were convicted because they were state employees, not because they were scientists. |
Posted by: phil_b 2012-10-24 18:42 |
#4 If you google the headline, the BBC article should pop up as the first option. I tried copy/pasting that URL into the source box, but for whatever reason that did not fix the problem. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2012-10-24 18:15 |
#3 Copy the link address, paste it in the URL block and trim off the unneeded part. |
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839 2012-10-24 16:13 |
#2 Link is 404. |
Posted by: gromky 2012-10-24 15:59 |
#1 Gee, what do you think these boneheads want to do to scientists that don't warn about MMGW? Can't come up with the words to describe this. Has anyone found a tie between someones money and this? |
Posted by: AlanC 2012-10-24 11:20 |