Submit your comments on this article |
-Election 2012 |
You know who, blames Sandy on Global Warming |
2012-10-31 |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#12 Hey, when Chris Matthews is on your side, you know you are...sooo screwed. |
Posted by: tu3031 2012-10-31 21:11 |
#11 Doom Sayers, go die. Americans will be fine without you. |
Posted by: Thrert Creresh3656 2012-10-31 15:59 |
#10 Voldemort? |
Posted by: Cincinnatus Chili 2012-10-31 14:28 |
#9 No warmist has so far put forth which type of SUV the Dinosaurs were driving back in their 'global warming' period. |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2012-10-31 13:35 |
#8 No warmist has so far put forth an argument that any proposed amelioration of AGW will actually make a difference on a time frame of less than 200 years. All their action proposals are designed to cripple Western economies. Period. |
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418 2012-10-31 13:26 |
#7 The alternative to "Anthropogenic Climate Change" is "Non-Anthropogenic Climate Change." No warmist has so far put forward an argument why removing humanity's influence on earth's climate system would make the present interglacial phase permanent. Not perturbing a complex system is not the equivalent to stabilizing said system. |
Posted by: Unereng Ulaper4796 2012-10-31 13:13 |
#6 The Global Warming |
Posted by: JohnQC 2012-10-31 12:54 |
#5 And who else is blaming global warming but Chris Matthews CHRIS MATTHEWS: Well Professor [Michael] Oppenheimer, back in the 60s, we calls such people pigs. Pigs. No, really. They donÂ’t care about the planet, they donÂ’t care about the destruction of war. All they want is what they got, their stuff, and they want more of it. Is that what weÂ’re facing here, just greed? IÂ’m not talking about the guy at the coal mind, thatÂ’s hard work. IÂ’m talking about people who wonÂ’t listen to you, wonÂ’t listen to science because they want more stuff. |
Posted by: tipper 2012-10-31 12:10 |
#4 In case you missed it, this week, there was a tragedy in New England. 47,000 people died - an entire coast wiped out. |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2012-10-31 11:18 |
#3 Al's trying to re-capture his glory days of global warming. Puts one in mind of this quote: "You don't understand. I coulda had class. I coulda been a contender. I coulda been somebody, instead of a bum, which is what I am." |
Posted by: JohnQC 2012-10-31 10:09 |
#2 Cause nothing says global warming like snow. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2012-10-31 09:49 |
#1 Yawn. I did a little research yesterday and equated the rainfall event for D.C. to about a ten-year return period (frequency). Compare with some New York clown on the news who said, "We seem to be getting a hundred-year storm every two years now." I bet he has all of Al's books. Take a look at this: Rainfall chart. The difference between a ten-year event in Chicago (hello,Doc White!) and a 100-year event is about 1.75" of rain in a 24-hour period - 4" for the 10-year and 5.75" for the 100-year. In a 24-hour period. Al's trying to distract the folks from Benghazigate. |
Posted by: Bobby 2012-10-31 09:47 |