You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Hizbut Tahrir made three attempts to penetrate army
2012-10-31
[Dawn] The conviction of Brigadier Ali Khan and four other army officers for their links with Hizbut Tahrir
...an al-Qaeda recruiting organization banned in most countries. It calls for the reestablishment of the Caliphate...
(HuT) was the third attempt of the banned
...the word banned seems to have a different meaning in Pakistain than it does in most other places. Or maybe it simply lacks any meaning at all...
organization
to penetrate into the military in the past 10 years.

On August 3, a military court convicted Brigadier Ali Khan, Major Sohail Akbar, Major Jawad Baseer, Major Inayat Aziz and Major Iftikhar for having links with HuT and sentenced them to rigorous imprisonment for terms ranging from 5 years to 18 months.

Back in 2003, HuT established links with about 13 commandos of the armyÂ’s Special Services Group (SSG), in 2009 officers up to the ranks of lieutenant colonel faced court martial for links with HuT and in 2011 a brigadier faced the same charges.Interestingly, in two of these incidents the same HuT members approached the army officers in 2009 and 2011. Although the army authorities have started court martial proceedings against the officers, it appears no action has been taken against them.

According to the documents available with Dawn, HuT activists Abdul Qadir and Ahmed, a doctor, were found to have links with Lt-Col Shahid Bashir in 2009 and Brig Ali Khan in 2011.

Both reports referred to the same activists to establish the case against the officers.
Posted by:Fred

#2  From what i have read about Hizbut there is not much difference than what what most Pakistanis want ie the Caliphate returning.
Posted by: Fester Clunter7205   2012-10-31 17:54  

#1  See also DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > NO NEGOTIATION BY TALIBAN WITH COALITION EXCEPT THROUGH ITS "POLITICAL OFFICE": MULLAH OMAR.

Reminds me of the COSVN from the Vietnam War era = histoire'.

Iff the Hard Boyz can set up a formal "political office", then they can also penetrate the Pak Defense Ministry + Mil HQ.

versus

* BHARAT RAKSHAK > [OilPrice.com] IS PAKISTAN'S [historical, Govt-State]PARANOIA PUSHING IT INTO A WAR [future Nuke War] WID INDIA?

ARTIC = Among other, denotes that iff Pakistan fails to control or prevent the MilTerr Groups from taking over its National Govt., ANY FUTURE NEW PAKISTAN WAR AGZ INDIA WILL NO LONGER BE A QUESTION OF "IFF" BUT "WHEN".

> Pakistan has been twitchy since its founding + espec since its defeat vee India in the 1971 Indo-Pak War which saw the loss of Bangladesh from its territory. A NOW SMALLER PAKISTAN SAW ITS DEV OF AN INDIGENOUS NUCLEAR ARSENAL AS AN "EQUALIZER" AGZ THE MUCH LARGER + NUCLEAR INDIA.
> Pakistan believes the US does want to see any Muslim country dev or possess Nuclear Weapons of any sort, hence closely monitors the US for any sign that the US will soon move to take over or destroy its nuclear arsenal.
> TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPONS [TNWS = Tacnukes] has become the new "equalizer" for Pakistan given that both it + India now possess potent LR strategic missles, + espec that INDIA HAS NO TACNUCWEAPS AT THIS TIME, SEEMINGLY GIVING PAKISTAN A PREEEMPTIVE OR FIRST-STRIKE MIL ADVANTAGE IFF A NEW INDO-PAK WAR OCCURS IN NEAR-FUTURE.

IIUC, IOW Pakistan must militarily strike India first before India develops any effective countermeasures or counterweapons.

* SAME > WHEN AFGHANS LOOK TO THE BORDER WID PAKISTAN, THEY DON'T SEE A FIXED LINE [Durand line].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2012-10-31 01:26  

00:00