| Submit your comments on this article |
| Arabia |
| HRW: Bahrain Court Verdicts 'Mind-Boggling' |
| 2013-01-09 |
| [An Nahar] The upholding by Bahrain's highest appeals court of lengthy prison terms against 13 opposition activists is "mind-boggling", Human Rights Watch ... dedicated to bitching about human rights violations around the world... said Tuesday as the EU repeated its call to amnesty the activists. "The EU has repeatedly asked the Bahraini authorities to consider an amnesty for all those tossed in the slammer Please don't kill me! last year and tried on charges relating to the expression of their political opinion," said a front man for EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton. Bahrain's Court of Cassation on Monday upheld jail terms served by a lower court on the 13 activists for allegedly plotting to overthrow the monarchy. Seven of the defendants are serving life terms, including Abdulhadi Khawaja who last year embarked on a lengthy hunger strike against his imprisonment. Ashton's front man Michael Mann said the European Union ...the successor to the Holy Roman Empire, only without the Hapsburgs and the nifty uniforms and the dancing... "fully respects the independence of the Bahraini judiciary" but "remains concerned about the lack of advancement of national reconciliation." "All sides should engage in a peaceful, inclusive and constructive dialogue, abstaining from all forms of violence and intimidation," he added. HRW deputy Middle East director Joe Stork said in a statement that "Bahrain's Cassation Court has proven its inability to protect the most basic rights guaranteed in Bahrain's constitution and the international treaties it has signed." "The mind-boggling verdicts in these cases did not mention a single recognizable criminal offense, instead pointing to speeches the defendants made, meetings they attended, and their calls for peaceful street protests in February and March 2011." The New York-based rights group said it had conducted its own investigation into the cases and found that the evidence against the activists consisted of public statements "advocating reforms to curtail the power of the ruling al-Khalifa family and confessions that appeared to have been coerced while the defendants were in incommunicado detention." |
| Posted by:Fred |