You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Google boss Schmidt labels China an 'IT menace'
2013-02-04
[BBC.CO.UK] Google Chairman Eric Schmidt uses a new book to call China an Internet menace that backs cyber-crime for economic and political gain, reports say.

The New Digital Age - due for release in April - reportedly brands China "the world's most active and enthusiastic filterer of information".

China is "the most sophisticated and prolific" hacker of foreign companies, according to a review obtained by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

China denies allegations of hacking.
"No, no! Certainly not!"
Revolution coming?
Beijing has been accused by several governments, foreign companies and organizations of carrying out extensive cyber espionage for many years, seeking to gather information and to control China's image.

The New Digital Age analyses how China is dangerously exploiting an Internet that now permeates politics, business, culture and other aspects of life, the WSJ says.

It quotes the book as saying: "The disparity between American and Chinese firms and their tactics will put both the government and the companies of the United States at a distinct disadvantage."

This, it says, is because Washington "will not take the same path of digital corporate espionage, as its laws are much stricter (and better enforced) and because illicit competition violates the American sense of fair play".

The book argues that Western governments could do more to follow China's lead and develop stronger relationships between the state and technology companies.

States will benefit if they use software and technology made by trusted companies, it suggests.

"Where Huawei gains market share, the influence and reach of China grow as well," the WSJ quoted the authors as writing.

The WSJ this week said its computer systems had been hacked by specialists in China who were trying to monitor its China coverage.

It was the second reported attack on a major US news outlet in days, as the New York Times
...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...
reported earlier that Chinese hackers had "persistently" penetrated its systems for the last four months.

China's foreign ministry dismissed the New York Times' accusations as "groundless" and "totally irresponsible".
Posted by:Fred

#6  Without the focus of proper customer choice companies die slowly from the inside.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2013-02-04 14:29  

#5  The book argues that Western governments could do more to follow China's lead and develop stronger relationships between the state and technology companies.

Spoken like the true corporate twin of the classic Fascist/Corporatist state. Benito would be proud.
Posted by: AlanC   2013-02-04 12:59  

#4  If you have a website, Rantburg, and take any time at all to analyze your logs you will see that a great many hacking attempts originate in China. It really is a form of state sponsored terrorism. If it was up to me I'd firewall the whole damn country. I would cut off all trade with them. All of it. No exceptions. Why do we do anything at all to enrich a hostile, aggressive, totalitarian dictatorship?

As for the likes of Google, Apple, HP, Dell and Microsoft doing business with the fascist bastards I can only say they are paving the way to their own funerals. What a bunch of fucking morons.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2013-02-04 12:53  

#3  this is the new cold war and we need to act like it
Posted by: Clusong Gromort6441   2013-02-04 09:17  

#2  Reprint of a comment I made at Belmont Club on this issue:

Perhaps we are looking at this the wrong way.

The way I see it, Google et al are like any entity that wants to cement its income stream and power and then grow both. The desire to do so isnÂ’t new and has always been there, but the ability to prevail upon the government with conversation and writing didnÂ’t exist. Prior to now they had political leaders with whom they were hostile, largely by choice. Now that they have a wholly owned government with a mighty military, one over which they can exert some influence to use against their enemies.

In other words, they have always known of the “greatness”, but loathed it right up until the point when they could wield it. They don’t respect the institutions, or the philosophy and sacrifice that made them possible, just the utility, in our throwaway society (ironic that most of them are “green” and believers in recycling etc.).

“Those are OUR planes, now”, as was once famously said.
Posted by: no mo uro   2013-02-04 07:46  

#1  The book argues that Western governments could do more to follow China's lead and develop stronger relationships between the state and technology companies.

Double Huh? If Bill and Melinda were any closer, they'd be sleeping in the West Wing!
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-02-04 04:52  

00:00