| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| U.S. Declares Islamic Terrorism Is Not Islamic |
| 2013-04-23 |
| Posted by:tipper |
| #5 iff China does not back down vee Japan + US in NE Asia over disputed ECS islands andor SCS, Radical Islam's Hard Boyz will only become MORE inspired to expand their GLOBAL JIHAD, which IMO is aka GLOBAL MOHAMMEDDAN/ISLAMIC/MUSLIM CONQUEST. RADICAL ISLAM = POST-1975 NORTH VIETNAMESE OFFICIO = whom, when told how the US won all the battles during in the Vietnam War [post-9-11 GWOT], FAMOUSLY REPLIED "YES, BUT THAT IS IRRELEVANT". > NORTH VIETNAM = in the end conquered the South. > RADICAL ISLAM = IN THE END GOT THEIR NUKES?, + OWG ISLAMIST CALIPHATE??? |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2013-04-23 20:27 |
| #4 This is a reason or good example of why the Islamist Jihad, which is GLOBAL, is EXPANDING. While Radicalist Mullahs, Preachers, Madrassas, etal. tell loyal Muslims to go ahead + kill or behead the Infidel, + wage violent Jihad, US + WESTERN GOVTS COME ALONG + EFFECTIVELY AGREE WID THEM DESPITE PROCLAIMING CONTRARY INTENTIONS. Directly or indirectly, the Jihadis - current + future - will interprete pervasive US-Western PCorrectness + Waffle-isms AS DE FACTO WEAKNESS + A SIGN FROM GOD THAT THEIR VIOLENT JIHAD IS CORRECT, RIGHTEOUS, + ABOVE ALL WINNING. JOHN-WAYNE-VS-NELVILLE-CHAMBERLAIN/JIMMY CARTER. > Chamberlain's well-intentioned written promise of peace. > POTUS Carter's well-intentioned attempt to heal the national divisiveness wrought by the Vietnam War vee STRATEGIC, POLITICAL MORALISM which he naively or foolishly thought would result in new rapprochement wid the USSR + Commie Bloc - instead, wwhile the latter were giving their approval to Jimbo's + US' "New MOralism" they mil invaded Afghanistan + rapidly expanded pro-Commie-SOviet recolutionary communist movements worldwide. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2013-04-23 20:14 |
| #3 The left is so tied up with how things are said, they actually believe that if we stopped calling it "Islamic Terrorism" the Islamists would stop terrorism. Just like the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act...so where is the affordability in that? Check the names the Democrats put on their legislation, all of these misleading feel good names, how can you be opposed to fluffy bunny protection when the bill only has a few billion for cronyism in it? Quit being so mean to the fluffy bunnies. |
| Posted by: Bill Clinton 2013-04-23 10:35 |
| #2 If there is any comfort to be had here it's that all of this once again shows the Left lives in a mythical view of the world. That's important in that if there is ever another civil war, the people on the other side will be operating upon false premises and understanding of their opponents. “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle” ― Sun Tzu, The Art of War |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2013-04-23 08:33 |
| #1 The FBI does not discuss how it deals with sort of thing, because that would give potential terrorists an edge in avoiding detection. Terrorists need an "edge" with the FBI ? In the meantime army commanders have been ordered to pay attention to religious or political activities of their subordinates and sound off if radical or dangerous behavior appears to be in the works. This is a lot to ask from officers who know that some bad publicity not only makes the army look bad but damages career prospects. Fire 6 or 8 Army generals and everyone else will get the message. While Nidal Hasan may have been stopped with more aggressive monitoring, not enough is known about what the Tsarnaev brothers were doing while unmonitored and preparing for the terrorist attacks. Who cares? They continued to be met and we were able to wrote great reports for Main, that's all we asked ! |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2013-04-23 07:49 |