You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Obama Serves 14-State Governors With Warnings of Arrest
2013-05-24
[BEFOREITSNEWS] Barack Hussein Obama had served 14-State Governors in the United States, National Security Letters (NSLs) warning that the Governor's actions in attempting to form "State Defense Forces" needs to be halted "immediately" or they will face arrest for the crime of treason. The employment of NSLs was authorized by the Patriot Act introduced by George W. Bush. Contained within the section related to these letters, it is forbidden for anyone receiving a NSL warning to even acknowledge the existence of said communication.

Obama is angered by the several State Governors who have reestablished "State Defense Forces." These forces are described as: "State Defense Forces (also known as State Guards, State Military Reserves, State Militias) in the United States are military units that operate under the sole authority of a state government; they are not regulated by the National Guard Bureau nor are they part of the Army National Guard of the United States. State Defense Forces are authorized by state and federal law and are under the command of the governor of each state. State Defense Forces are distinct from their state's National Guard in that they cannot become federal entities."

Mr. Obama is fearful of these State Defense Forces, in that he does not have control of said forces, and with the U.S. Military stretched to near breaking from multiple deployments and theatre actions in Iraq and Afghanistan, these State military forces would be under the direct command and authority of the Governors in which states have said forces. In essence, the Governors would have "de facto control" of the United States.
Posted by:Fred

#24  These sorts of organizations pre-date the Obama administration. In fact, many of them pre-date the formation of the National Guard.

The problem with "Before It's News" is that it tends to be "Before It's Real". I would put them in the same bucket as DEBKA. Fun to read, but probably made up by the person typing up the story.

Posted by: crosspatch   2013-05-24 22:45  

#23  That's nothing. Georgia has rampaging kudzu and millions of volunteer fire ants.
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-05-24 20:16  

#22  Texas has a large and active state defense force, including training, ops, comm, Air Force (transport), navy (coastal and riverine), and even a Marine force, in addition to the typical Army units. These are in addition to the Guard units.
Posted by: OldSpook   2013-05-24 19:29  

#21  It's probably not correct, but it does sound plausible when you consider the ongoing unconstitutional behavior of the Bambi people, and the approval of their leftist lapdogs. >:-(
Posted by: Barbara   2013-05-24 18:58  

#20  "Contained within the section related to these letters, it is forbidden for anyone receiving a NSL warning to even acknowledge the existence of said communication." How convenient.
I saw this same story several weeks ago, didn't buy it then and not buying it now. Aside from the references to governors no longer in office, does anyone really think that NONE of the governors that supposdly received the letter would hold a press conference about this?
Posted by: Chantry   2013-05-24 18:32  

#19  From the next paragraph in the article ... "The two Governors leading this move are: Tim Pawlenty, Governor of Minnesota; and Rick Perry, Governor of Texas."

T-Paw is no longer the Governor here (here = Minnesota). As 7thDim pointed out, the current Gov. here is Mark Dayton.

So, odd? Yeah, odd.
Posted by: ExtremeModerate   2013-05-24 17:04  

#18  Rambler: on the other hand do you see a case for espionage against James Rosen?
Posted by: George Snomoper6213   2013-05-24 13:31  

#17  We'll see if the proof is in the pudding. If these states stop any activity around the creation, maintenance or organizational control of SDFs then we can suspect that there is some fire to go with the smoke.

If nothing changes.......

The question is how long do we have to wait?
Posted by: AlanC   2013-05-24 13:04  

#16  NSL's normally are demand letters used to obtain information accompanied by a gag order and normally are not executive orders. Google however went public in a fight against NSL's that demand information on Google customers, email, sites visited, etc..

NSL can be issued from a low level FBI field office manager. It circumvents the Constitutional protection against unreasonable searches.

I would not put it past this POTUS to try to intimidate Governors as the Federal gag order associated with NSL's would intimidate Governors to keep quite about his attempts at disarming the States through incarcerating the states governors.

Its fits his power grab mentality.
Posted by: Winky Sproing5899   2013-05-24 12:39  

#15  Well, yes. Consider the source.
Posted by: Pappy   2013-05-24 12:15  

#14  Sounds like more paranoid ultra-right wing tin foil stuff to me.
Posted by: DarthVader   2013-05-24 12:02  

#13  I agree that this sounds so outrageous to be unbelievable. I really don't see any basis for a charge of treason. The trials would be interesting.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2013-05-24 11:57  

#12  48-hour rule. Sounds bogus....

I don't think even Obumbles nor his masters would be this stupid.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2013-05-24 11:04  

#11  This has nothing to do with Breitbart. It is likely entirely bogus.
Posted by: KBK   2013-05-24 10:48  

#10  The State Defense Forces have been a feature of the US since before 1776. During WWII practically every state had them, and they were used to replace the National Guard while the National Guard was off fighting the war.

Many, if not most of the people in these units have law enforcement backgrounds and back up the police during natural (or man made) disasters.
Posted by: Frozen Al   2013-05-24 10:36  

#9   In essence, the Governors would have "de facto control" of the United States.
That sounds a lot like the federalism our Founders intended.
Posted by: Woggut   2013-05-24 10:31  

#8  If this is real,
Indeed, Procopius; something is peculiar about this story - we should have heard more in the past two weeks if it was as it seemed. Breitbart.com is usually pretty good but maybe this was from some low-level flunky in some casual context or such. It is clearly unconstitutional (but then a lot of stuff is clearly unconstitutional to me but not the Supreme Court) and against all historical precedent.
Posted by: Glenmore   2013-05-24 10:13  

#7  Reply to Rambler in Virginia: Technically One

Mark Brandt Dayton (born January 26, 1947) is an American politician and the current and 40th Governor of Minnesota, serving since 2011. He was previously a United States Senator for Minnesota from 2001 to 2007, and the Minnesota State Auditor from 1991 to 1995. He is a member of the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party (DFL), which affiliates with the national Democratic Party.

The other 13 are to the best of my research via wiki, Republican.
Posted by: The 7th Dimension   2013-05-24 09:33  

#6  How many of those 14 are Democrats?
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2013-05-24 09:09  

#5  They've always been there. Some states have allow them to lapse. Some have been reduced to basically administrative offices.

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

The Constitution doesn't prohibit it. In fact for the Civil War, the national government relied upon the states to provide the bulk of the Union Army.

With the downsizing of the federal military in the Great Peace Dividend at the end of the Cold War, the gutting of the regulars meant that the following conflicts would involve the activation of a significant portion of the Reserves and, particularly, the National Guard. When NG units are federalized and deployed that leaves the states without the manpower and services to address natural disasters and civil unrest. Several states have personally experienced that in the last 10 years of active worldwide military commitments.

If this is real, it needs to be broadcasted to the fullest as a clear sign that there won't be a 2014 election.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-05-24 08:15  

#4  hmmmmm perhaps we now know why DHS is buying up all those hollowpoints?
Posted by: Frank G   2013-05-24 07:41  

#3  Meanwhile ...

* IIRC TOPIX > THE MOST DANGEROUS RADICAL ISLAMIST IN THE WORLD IS ALIVE, WELL, + LIVING IN PENNSYLVANIA.

And apparently seemingly NOT under threat of arrest by the Bammer + Admin.

'Twill be the proverbial "icing on the cake" iff he went to Penn State.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-05-24 03:28  

#2  Washington DC occupies a very tiny little plot of ground for someone to be threatening/intimidating the biggest states in the Union from. Just goes to show how ignorant the Junior Senator from bankrupt Illinois is.
Posted by: Whock de Medici1307   2013-05-24 00:55  

#1  
Posted by: diebaggerdie   2013-05-24 00:33  

00:00