You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
The Pentagon Is Preparing A Cruise Missile Attack Against Syria
2013-08-24
Update to earlier submission.

Paging Orville Redenbacher - Orville Redenbacher to the white courtesy phone please....
This is from Zero Hedge who can be rather, um, nervous at times.

Of course the Pentagon is planning a cruise missile strike against Syria. They pro'ly have plans for a cruise missile strike against Vanuatu. It's what military people do, plan. Sometimes you need the plans and quickly so it's best to be prepared.
Posted by:Uncle Phester

#28  Frankly, while I think McCain is, well, possibly demented, I think he's merely providing cover for what Zero really wants to do. As with the F-22 and missile defense, as well.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2013-08-24 23:55  

#27  YEah, I'm SURE he was a nice little isolationist before that mean McCain man made him make those decisions....
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2013-08-24 23:54  

#26  http://www.debka.com/article/23218/The-sarin-shells-fired-on-Damascus---by-Syrian-4th-Division%E2%80%99s-155th-Brigade---were-followed-by-rockets-on-Israel-and-car-bombings-in-Lebanon-
Posted by: 3dc   2013-08-24 22:40  

#25  (Isn't it strange how Zero always finds a way to hurt us and give the superficially-inclined a way to pretend he's a tough guy at the same time?)

He caved to GOP morons like Graham and McCain. Ultimately, the GOP's idiotic neocon dogma, which holds, against our bloody and expensive recent experience, that inside every foreigner is an American struggling to get out, is the cause of all these botched foreign policy problems. Obama's afraid to look weak and he's ceding ground to the GOP on these moronic interventions. The GOP should be making a stand on keeping the F-22 lines open and proceeding with missile defense research. Instead, it lets Obama cut those programs while forging ahead with wasteful, asinine and politically-unpopular foreign interventions. The retards who keep on urging these interventions need to be primaried and defeated, even if the cost is a Democratic pol in their place.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2013-08-24 22:31  

#24  "To all the ranters baggers"

Oh, look - a pathetic, unimaginative troll.

Isn't that cute?
Posted by: Barbara   2013-08-24 22:15  

#23  Hagel: Obama asks for Syria military options

Will be interesting to watch President Barak "Hamlet" Obama work this crisis about....
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2013-08-24 20:55  

#22  The Russians didn't care about Libya. Gaddafi had pretty much surrendered his WMD programs after the Iraq Invasion, before it turned into the Iraqi Nation-Building exercise, and I'm fairly sure they were actually happy to watch the UK/France/US make an example of a country that had switched sides and started to cooperate with us.

(Isn't it strange how Zero always finds a way to hurt us and give the superficially-inclined a way to pretend he's a tough guy at the same time?)
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2013-08-24 20:17  

#21  When has Russia stood in the way of our doing anything before....IE Lybia.

Depends on how far one wishes to go back.

Iran?

Iraq, pre-second Gulf war?

Extraditing Eric Snowden (assuming the WH wanted him retrieved?)
Posted by: Pappy   2013-08-24 18:24  

#20  When has Russia stood in the way of our doing anything before....IE Lybia. It is different if we can take down someone who cannot do anything about it, but Syria, where does Obama have any concern... It is not his concern that millions are dying. Just so he looks good. We don't have to set foot in Syria, just send the missles - they can find the targets that are needed. Then let them fight on a even footing.
Posted by: To all the ranters baggers    2013-08-24 15:11  

#19  an Assad-apologist bitch, hmmm?
Posted by: Frank G   2013-08-24 14:39  

#18  Ranter-Baggers... LOL
Posted by: Shipman   2013-08-24 14:36  

#17  The chemical attack of the regime in the outskirts of Damascus is a response to the attack on the convoy of Syrian President Bashar Assad on Eid al-Fitr.
Posted by: To all the ranters baggers    2013-08-24 14:25  

#16  No, it's Tyler.

The others are high functioning sociopaths,
Posted by: Pappy   2013-08-24 13:22  

#15  ZF, you sure that the "high-functioning lunatic" isn't the Obamanation?
Posted by: AlanC   2013-08-24 12:53  

#14  After reading the article's flat-out weird explanation of the US motive for such an attack, I've concluded that the writer is a high-functioning lunatic.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2013-08-24 12:27  

#13  Warm up with the Hezbolla in Lebanon and then work your way into Syria without picking a side; take them all out and let the Kurds and Israelies sort it out.
Posted by: Airandee   2013-08-24 12:00  

#12  Channeling bubba, since that strike was so effective. Champ and the real president ValJar, are conducting every act, including foreign policy, through a political lens. As an aside, can anyone recall another prisidential advisor before ValJar that had a dedicated Secret Service detail?
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2013-08-24 11:16  

#11  Well, Assad has been rolling up the rebels like crazy and regaining control of the country. He may have done it just to rub our noses in it that we don't have any options anymore, and our dog-in-the-fight has been euthanised.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2013-08-24 10:12  

#10   Assuming Assad did order the attack, he must be either desperate or confident there would be no significant consequences.

"Assuming" being the critical, operative word here.
Posted by: Pappy   2013-08-24 09:56  

#9  If true then the rebels are losing just like the Russians have been saying.
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2013-08-24 09:18  

#8  good thing Assad now has enough time to properly prepare "Baby Milk Factory" and "Orphans of Terrorism Orphanage" signs
Posted by: Frank G   2013-08-24 08:56  

#7  Champ won't launch Tomahawks unless Vlad provides the targeting folders, then watch the thousands of dead kiddie and woman foto's.

Worst case; some renegade Russian naval commander launches against one of our ships. High stakes he's playing. I hope he knows it.
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-08-24 08:45  

#6  And when the "international community" will look the other way while triumphant Sunnis ethnically cleanse Allawites and Christians.

Hey, maybe even twofer: if some run from the butchering knives toward Golan, Israel will either to take them in or shoot them.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2013-08-24 08:18  

#5  Let's see, the "rebels" include MoBro & Al-Q right? So of course Obastard wants to support them.

Granted he doesn't hate Iran or Hezbis but if he gets a choice.........
Posted by: AlanC   2013-08-24 07:56  

#4  "Nervous"....I like that!

ZH did, however, get the feed from CBS, "America's Most Watched Network" (ValJar wouldn't stomach using Fox News.), so I'm-a-thinkin' Phil & Steve are prolly correct....
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2013-08-24 06:56  

#3  Shhhh
Posted by: Mikey Hunt   2013-08-24 01:57  

#2  The fact that this 'secret' military action is being announced on CBS suggests it is more for public consumption than an actual operational plan. A nice way to do something without actually doing something. Which isn't as bad as it sounds since there isn't really any good something to do. Besides nuking the whole mess, I mean.
Posted by: SteveS   2013-08-24 00:30  

#1  Assuming Assad did order the attack, he must be either desperate or confident there would be no significant consequences.

A few dozen cruise missiles could take out most of his best assets.

Perhaps Russia assured him that they would warn US of serious consequences for such an attack. Which makes me pretty confident nothing will happen.
Posted by: phil_b   2013-08-24 00:06  

00:00