You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Kerry: US says has 'duty' to act after Syria nerve gas attack
2013-08-31
[Dawn] The United States released intelligence on Friday to show why it is certain that Syrian forces have killed civilians with chemical weapons and said Washington has a historic duty to act.

As a time window for expected US air strikes beckoned, the White House produced a declassified intelligence report which said 1,429 people including 426 children were killed in the August 21 outrage outside Damascus.

Secretary of State John F. I was in Vietnam, you know Kerry
Former Senator-for-Life from Massachussetts, self-defined war hero, speaker of French, owner of a lucky hat, conqueror of Cambodia, and current Secretary of State...
meanwhile made an impassioned case for a "tailored" US response, despite the lack of a United Nations
...boodling on the grand scale...
mandate, and without help from Washington's closest ally, Britannia where politicians blocked action.

"This is the indiscriminate, inconceivable horror of chemical weapons. This is what (President Bashar al-)Assad did to his own people," Kerry said.

"The question is what are we collectively, what are we in the world, going to do about it?" The White House report said the judgment on the attack was based on "multiple" streams of intelligence including witness reports, satellite data and signals intercepts.

"The United States government assesses with high confidence that the Syrian government carried out a chemical weapons attack in the Damascus suburbs on August 21, 2013," the report said.

"We further assess that the regime used a nerve agent in the attack."

The unclassified assessment, which omitted sourcing and raw intelligence to protect US espionage assets, also debunked the theory, advanced notably by Russia, that opposition forces could be to blame.

"We assess that the scenario in which the opposition executed the attack ... is highly unlikely," the report said.

"Our high confidence assessment is the strongest position that the US Intelligence Community can take short of confirmation."

The report said Washington had intercepted the communications of a senior Syrian official, who was intimately familiar with the operation, soon after rockets started raining down on civilians.

The official confirmed that chemical weapons were used, and was concerned with UN inspectors obtaining evidence, the report said.

Kerry said the US government had repeatedly assessed the intelligence in the report, to avoid the kind of fiasco that erupted over botched covert material used to justify the Iraq war.

"We will not repeat that moment," he said.

And he argued that the world could not ignore the use of some of its most pernicious weaponry on some of its most vulnerable people.

"It matters because a lot of other countries whose policies challenge these international norms are watching," he said.

That included, he said, Iran with which Washington is locked in a long nuclear showdown.

"It's about whether Iran, which itself has been a victim of chemical weapons attacks, will now feel emboldened in the absence of action to obtain nuclear weapons.

"It's about Hezbollah and every other terrorist group that might contemplate the use of weapons of mass destruction."

Kerry also addressed domestic political opinion in his speech, mindful of polls showing little public support for American action in a new Middle Eastern war.

"We know that after a decade of conflict, the American people are tired of war," he said.

"But fatigue does not absolve us of our responsibility.

"History would judge us all extraordinarily harshly if we turned a blind eye to a dictator's wanton use of weapons of mass destruction against all warnings, against all common understanding of decency."
Posted by:Fred

#8  To clarify - Kerry threw someone else's medals away.
Posted by: Raj   2013-08-31 17:03  

#7  Waterhead.
Posted by: Mojo   2013-08-31 14:03  

#6  Coming from the guy who trashed the military, threw his medals away, and happily entered negotions with the enemy in contrast to national presteige, spent years arguing against this same policy when W was calling it, chose Edwards as his right hand man and lost to Bush tax cheat lawyer.

Tired of war? This is the non interventionist smart diplomacy post american world, as promised.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2013-08-31 13:50  

#5  I suspect that if the President were a Republican he would leading the charge for impeachment.

Like the vast majority of politicians (both Republican and Democrat) he is a piece of s***.
Posted by: Kelly   2013-08-31 13:24  

#4  TF - the oath of the commissioned officers is different.

I, _____, having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God."

You notice a missing phrase in there? Back in the pre-PC military they remembered this oath -

"Ich schwöre bei Gott diesen heiligen Eid, daß ich dem Führer des Deutschen Reiches und Volkes Adolf Hitler, dem Oberbefehlshaber der Wehrmacht, unbedingten Gehorsam leisten und als tapferer Soldat bereit sein will, jederzeit für diesen Eid mein Leben einzusetzen."
"I swear by God this sacred oath that to the Leader of the German empire and people, Adolf Hitler, supreme commander of the armed forces, I shall render unconditional obedience and that as a brave soldier I shall at all times be prepared to give my life for this oath."


The old military didn't want to make the same mistake here that was done there. Loyalty was to the law, not the man.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-08-31 08:23  

#3  Don't you just love the Leadership of the United States?

And its so inspiring to be the Greatest Nation of the Free World.

Makes you want to put on a uniform and serve your country, doesn't it?

But remember you have to give your Word...I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same. That I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.

You wanted to be a Marine, so now how does it feel to be a Puppet? Ready to give your life for Obama? or Kerry? How about Ronald McDonald?
Posted by: Threater Flusoper9823   2013-08-31 06:56  

#2  Kerry discussing "duty"... quite rich.
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-08-31 02:55  

#1  Notice nobody talk about IRS scandal, Obamacare implementation, or Chris Lane murder.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2013-08-31 02:46  

00:00