You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Experts: Don't bomb chemical weapon sites in Syria
2013-08-31
[APNEWS.MYWAY] You simply can't safely bomb a chemical weapon storehouse into oblivion, experts say. That's why they say the United States is probably targeting something other than Syria's nerve agents.

But now there is concern that bombing other sites could accidentally release dangerous chemical weapons that the U.S. military didn't know were there because they've lost track of some of the suspected nerve agents.

Bombing stockpiles of chemical weapons - purposely or accidentally - would likely kill nearby civilians in an accidental nerve agent release, create a long-lasting environmental catastrophe or both, five experts told The News Agency that Dare Not be Named. That's because under ideal conditions - and conditions wouldn't be ideal in Syria - explosives would leave at least 20 to 30 percent of the poison in lethal form.

"If you drop a conventional munition on a storage facility containing unknown chemical agents - and we don't know exactly what is where in the Syrian arsenal - some of those agents will be neutralized and some will be spread," said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association, a nonprofit that focuses on all types of weaponry. "You are not going to destroy all of them."
Posted by:Fred

#5  As I recall a FAE is also 'more' effective when contained. So any remaining post-HE structures will serve as concentration vessels for the penetrating FA mix.
Posted by: Skidmark   2013-08-31 14:30  

#4  So called "experts" in the press are dolts. As if the only weapons available are either HE or nukes.

HE followed-on by FAE. FAE are violent as hell, but they do tend to burn up anything that is aerosolized by the HE. ANd they will probably kill anyone that survived the HE attacks by exposing them to the subsequent FAE overpressure detonation, so to be politically convenient, the FAE will be the cause fo death, not nerve agent.

Of course the FAE will make hella-big beaten areas, as well as making a very big bada boom. So there's the political downside too.
Posted by: OldSpook   2013-08-31 13:47  

#3  Good thing we have experts, eh?
Posted by: Kelly   2013-08-31 13:16  

#2  Well, if you nuke a chemical weapons site, the chemicals won't be a problem.

Of course, the nuke will create its own environmental problems.

Except that it would set a very dangerous precedent, maybe Congress should insist that Obama file an environmental impact statement for every attack.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2013-08-31 12:58  

#1  Hell this war is going on terminal hold if we are needing an environmental impacter statement.

But why not? Why not indeed, a perfect cover.
Posted by: Shipman   2013-08-31 12:49  

00:00