[TELEGRAPH.CO.UK] Britannia and the US have questioned the future worth of the UN Security Council, amid international condemnation of Russia's two-year veto of action against the Syrian regime.| Submit your comments on this article |
| International-UN-NGOs |
| Britain and US question purpose of United Nations security council |
| 2013-09-08 |
| [TELEGRAPH.CO.UK] Britannia and the US have questioned the future worth of the UN Security Council, amid international condemnation of Russia's two-year veto of action against the Syrian regime. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #10 OOOOOOPPPPPPSSS, my bad, forgot MIDDLE EAST ONLINE > EUROPE [EuroUnion = EU, NATO?] HIT SYRIA [hard] BUT DON'T COUNT ON US. Not unlike the anti-Assad Muslim States. AND YET THE DEMAND THAT THE US CANNOT, SHOULD NOT, + MUST NOT BE ETC. THE "WORLD'S POLICEMAN" STILL RANTS ON. Well, I'm convinced ... lol. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2013-09-08 23:53 |
| #9 Iff they US + UK so choose, they can call for the formal amendment of the original UN Treaty, IIRC aka the Treaty of San Francisco establishing the United Nations in 1944 under then-POTUS Harry Truman??? NOTHING IS STOPPING THE US, UK, OR ANY OTHER SIGNATORY WORLD NATIONS FROM DOING SO EXCEPT THEMSELVES. ----------- * ION FREEREPUBLIC > [Gateway Pundit] WHITE HOUSE ADMIST IT HAS NO ALLIES FOR SYRIA ATTACK - A COALITION OF ONE!? RELATED BHARAT RAKSHAK > [Google News] TWO-THRIDS OF FRENCH OPPOSE SYRIA ACTION: POLL. * WASHINGTON POST [WaPo] > WHITE HOUSE: IRREFUTABLE ASSAD LINK TO GAS ATTACK LACKING, BUT PASSES "COMMON SENSE" [litmus] TEST. RELATED BHARAT RAKSHAK > [Reuters] DIRECT LINK BETWEEN ASSAD + GAS ATTACK ELUSIVE FOR US. versus * AFP > OBAMA SYRIA DIFFICULTIES CAUSES WORRIES IN ISRAEL. * FREEREPUBLIC > [WND.com] OBAMA OFFERS ASSAD SECRET DEAL, SET FOUR (4) CONDITIONS TO AVERT US ATTACK ON SYRIA. The Bammers' prob in this still remains the arrogance of the all-or-nothing Assad Govt, versus the all-or-nothing anti-Assad Syrian Rebels, now affected by the intrevention of foreign Hard Boyz. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2013-09-08 23:49 |
| #8 Judge Jeanine Explodes On Obama Over Syria |
| Posted by: Uncle Phester 2013-09-08 12:14 |
| #7 Well UP, this is one time we really don't have to read it, to know what is in it. This entire exercise is a crock of shi* that could easily blow up in our face. Telegraphing your plan of attack, then awaiting the arrival of the opposition is sheer madness. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2013-09-08 11:38 |
| #6 Rep. Amash: ‘If Americans Could Read Classified Docs, They’d Be Even More Against Syria Action’ |
| Posted by: Uncle Phester 2013-09-08 11:33 |
| #5 Britain and US question purpose of United Nations security council Cause it provides a fig leaf of legitimacy in the absence of Congressional Constitutional authorization to use military force in the absence of any immediate direct threat to the United States - ie Libya. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2013-09-08 10:23 |
| #4 Just one more example of the left's attitude of "If you don't agree with me on all things, you are evil and worthless." Note that there was no complaint at any of the other obstructionist actions when an R was in the WH. |
| Posted by: AlanC 2013-09-08 07:48 |
| #3 "President Vladimir Putin's refusal to budge since last month's chemical-weapons massacre prompted a group of 11 countries, including Britain and the US, to issue a sharply critical statement yesterday." They clearly understand the purpose of the UNSC. Sounds more as if they just realised sending strongly worded letters to oneself doesn't actually achieve much. |
| Posted by: Beldar Tingle4716 2013-09-08 04:40 |
| #2 People defy Light Worker---how can it be? |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2013-09-08 00:55 |
| #1 ...finally... |
| Posted by: Uncle Phester 2013-09-08 00:39 |