You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
O Can't Waste This Moment - Double Down! Crush the Radicals!
2013-10-14
The senseless government shutdown has led to a rout of the tea party, right-wing extremism and a House Republican leadership that was cowed into a march toward oblivion. But a great deal hangs on what happens next. Will this be a watershed moment? Or do we return to the same dreary politics that led to the shutdown in the first place?
I'm afraid it'll be more dreariness, E.J. You keep forgetting about the red half of the country.
What needs to happen is a sharp course correction -- from an agenda championed by the forces that were beaten in the last election to an engagement with the problems our nation must solve.
The One was re-elected, sure, but the House remains in GOP control, Mr. Dionne.
No by-line listed in this post but by the time I'd read to the second yellow comment I knew it was Dionne...
Democrats have been much tougher in this round of negotiations than they were in the past not only because the GOP vastly overreached in trying to gut Obamacare, but also because they know how important it is to insist that budget cutting and deficit reduction not be the sole priority of the political class. Rep. Paul Ryan (who was, by the way, the other member of the Republican ticket that lost last year, partly because of his budget ideas) hoped to steer the talks in this direction. But Democrats have made it clear that it's not 2011 anymore.
So budget cutting and deficit reduction are not the only priorities? What are the others?
The United States should build, not just cut. We should invest again in an infrastructure whose decayed condition ought to shame us. We should deal with high ongoing unemployment, reverse the rise of inequality and give poor and working-class kids real opportunities for upward mobility.
Actually I agree with the goals, so long as we don't raise taxes. SMARTER SPENDING™.
Future negotiations must be premised on getting rid of sequester cuts that are hobbling our economy and on matching future cuts with new revenues. Talk of changes in Social Security and Medicare need to take into account not only their long-term costs -- which require, above all, further fixes to our health-care system -- but also how these programs may be inadequate for a generation whose members will not enjoy the pensions their grandparents had.
More money to O'care, less to pensions!
It's important to understand that the American people really have blamed this mess on the GOP and really did revolt against the tea party's irrationality. The public's reaction has not been "a plague on both your houses," even if the shenanigans make Congress as a whole look very bad.
Keep it up with the Kool Aide, E.J.
The president and his allies seem determined to seize this moment and not squander a triumph built on a willingness to stand firm against right-wing radicalism. Obama can't slip back into the style of deficit wrangling that so weakened him in 2011. He now has an opening to refocus on his priorities: universal pre-kindergarten education, immigration reform, rebuilding our transportation and communications systems -- and, one would like to hope, an even broader agenda for speeding growth and sharing its dividends fairly.
No time for compromise! Forward!
Posted by:Bobby

#10  So the [anti-US] GLOBALISTS = NEW NEO-CONSERVATIVES, while the ANTI-GLOBALISTS = NATIONALISTS/
SOVEREIGNTISTS = NEW RADICALS/MILTERRS???

Clearly the side with PADME AMYGDALA + MILA KUNIS + PATRICIA VELASQUEZ, MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ,ETAL. WINS???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-10-14 19:49  

#9  If Paul Ryan proposed a budget that reduced federal spending by $1.00, it wouldn't pass and he would be accused (again) of taking money out of the mouths of starving children. (The $650 million pissed away on a non-functioning website somehow doesn't come out of the mouths of starving children.)
Posted by: Matt   2013-10-14 19:36  

#8  "The 'invest in infrastructure' would be a well received message had the previous several trillion borrowed dollars gone to actual infrastructure projects."

The money wouldn't go to actual infrastructure projects this time either, airandee.

Generally speaking, construction jobs are done by men - can't spend that money on all those jobs for burley men, y'know. >:-(

Posted by: Barbara   2013-10-14 13:39  

#7  Eliminate the biggest tax increase in history. Eliminate Obamacare.

Eliminate the slave trade. If you have to pay money to someone whether you buy or not buy, you are now a slave.
Posted by: Thrans Splat1574   2013-10-14 13:31  

#6  The bit that is really beginning to bore me is the "shameful infrastructure" talking point. True in Baltimore or Detroit, but outside the blue cities, ours is still more than adequate. Especially when one considers the over-built, over-engineered projects one sees in Europe and Eastasia. Those are jobs programs, not infrastructure.
Posted by: 11A5S   2013-10-14 11:48  

#5  I have come to believe that Dionne knows he is full of crap but he knows if enough of his friends say the same thing it becomes conventional wisdom and may actually become the truth when McCain and company start to beleave it. That is what happened with a lot of the polling in the last election. lie, lie, lie with polls until eventually turnout starts to look the way you want (and any voter fraud numbers start to look like the predictions and thus don't stand out).
Posted by: rjschwarz   2013-10-14 10:18  

#4  The 'invest in infrastructure' would be a well received message had the previous several trillion borrowed dollars gone to actual infrastructure projects.

The liberals increase spending when times are good, bad, near bankruptcy... There is never a time to cut spending; after all the real America is the GIVERnment.
Posted by: airandee   2013-10-14 10:09  

#3  The Left has demonstrated time and again, the heart felt desire for a one party system whether its Dear Leader or a 'King'. I don't recall the Left was too cooperating when Nixon won a second term. A lot of these writers weren't born yet, so its all prehistoric for them, as history is only what they can recall in their life's experience.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-10-14 10:01  

#2  [shakes head] I suppose reality has to be somewhere in between E.J. and the right-wing, whatever "reality" is...
Posted by: Bobby   2013-10-14 09:26  

#1  EJ pretty reliably represents the conventional wisdom of the mainstream left.

The fact that what he says is basically drivel tells us the problems of the mainstream left are, in their own way, as severe as those of the GOP.
Posted by: lord garth   2013-10-14 07:55  

00:00