You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Man-Made Climate Change May Poison Your Fish!
2013-10-14
In a lab experiment, researchers adjusted temperatures in tanks, tainted the killifish's food with traces of methylmercury and watched as the fish stored high concentrations of the metal in their tissue.
So they fed the fish mercury and the concentrations went up? This is science?
In a field experiment in nearby salt pools, they observed as killifish in warmer pools ate their natural food and stored metal in even higher concentrations, like some toxic condiment for larger fish that would later prey on them.
I wonder what happens if you feed them mercury in cooler pools?
The observation was part of a study showing how killifish at the bottom of the food chain will probably absorb higher levels of methylmercury in an era of global warming and pass it on to larger predator fish, such as the tuna stacked in shiny little cans in the cupboards of Americans and other people the world over.
If the oceans keep warming the way they are supposed to, and we keep force-feeding the little killifish mercury. I gotta go take a nap.
What about the climate temperature pause, guys, and the Atlantic multi-decadal oscillation, and warmer waters leading to more thunderstorms transferring heat to radiate into space, and all the other newly discovered factors which are leading some to think that this whole climate thingy is much more complicated and cyclical and, y'know, not conforming to current models and stuff? Honestly, you'd think researchers would read the skeptic sites just to know what kinds of questions will be asked so they could collect data to answer them definitively.
Posted by:Bobby

#4  So-o-o IIUC, IOW humanity can't build "floating" cities, let alone "underwater" cities, to escape GWCC because it will poison the fishies + food chain.

Time to eat the Bugs, or more accurately the BUG-ZILLAS whom will be hunting us for food just we will be hunting them for same???

* TOPIX > GLOBAL FOOD CRISIS: SEVEN INSECTS WE [Humanity] WILL BE EATING IN THE FUTURE.

["10,000 BC" MOVIE = SABRE-TOOTH FELINE STALKING, KILLING SEXY SLINKY CAVE-BABE here].
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-10-14 19:44  

#3  I fed cyprinodontiform fish
On a methylmercurious dish.
Since massaging the data
Made me mad as a hatter,
My conclusions are somewhat suspish.

Study's kinda Dr. Obvious but who cares? The teeming tropical multitudes will easily be fed on delicious, wholesome tilapia farmed in pristine meltponds across the erstwhile tundra belt. And for a tasty treat for the elite that can't be beat, that's neat and reet but sure ain't petite, I'm talking about mmm, mmm, mammoth meat. Yassuh! Put on your best togs, head down to the bogs and make like hogs with the dogs. It's going fast and it ain't gonna last. After that it's all bugs and blue-green algae

More orange stuff:
Nemo
Yams
CheeWees
MONARCH BUTTERFLY!
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220   2013-10-14 17:17  

#2  Might be simpler to just list the terrible things AGW won't cause.

The one thing it doesn't appear to be causing at the moment is global warming.
Posted by: SteveS   2013-10-14 16:53  

#1  Might be simpler to just list the terrible things AGW won't cause.
Posted by: Iblis   2013-10-14 14:16  

00:00