| Submit your comments on this article |
| Syria-Lebanon-Iran |
| IAEA, Iran say nuclear talks 'very productive' |
| 2013-10-30 |
| [Al Ahram] The UN atomic watchdog and Iran said they would meet again on 11 November over Tehran's nuclear programme after a "very productive meeting" on Tuesday. The meeting, which comes ahead of talks between Iran and world powers next week in Geneva, was about allegations that Tehran conducted nuclear weapons research prior to 2003. |
| Posted by:Fred |
| #3 OOOOOOOPPPPPPIES, forgot BIG NEWS NETWORK > KERRY SAYS "NO" TO ISRAEL'S WARNING ON IRAN, i.e. Netanyahu = Tel Aviv'S demand for new UN sanctions agz Iran's NucProgs. * SAME > "IRAN TWO WEEKS AWAY FROM WEAPONS-GRADE URANIUM" :IAEA OFFICIAL. ARTIC = Iran also at "point of no return" vee its advances in its Nucprogs. ------------ Lest we fergit, RUSSIA TODAY [OLD] > IFF THE US [truly] FOUGHT AGZ TERRORISM, IT WOULD SUPPORT ASSAD. Ditto anti-AL-QAEDA IRAN? CHINA? |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2013-10-30 21:39 |
| #2 We already know from earlier MSM-Net Repors that Iran desires to build both Uranium + Plutonium-based processing = enrichment sites, ostensibly for Iran-alleged NucEnergy-n-only-NucEnergy. Now comeths ... * JAPAN TIMES > SPENT [Nukulaar = Plutonium-based] FUEL GOOD ENOUGH FOR BOMB, US TOLD JAPAN IN 1977. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2013-10-30 21:16 |
| #1 Very productive in the sense that Iran is producing weapons grade uranium in ever increasing quantities? I really am beginning to think the IAEA is actually offering technical advice and quality control for Iran and NOT trying to rein in these nutjobs. With the bomb only months away, who cares what the freaking IAEA or the UN says? Anyway, what will the IAEA or the UN say if the Iranian bomb is used to choke the straits of Hormuz OR make a major ODEC city disappear? Write a strongly worded memo, condemn the US, or make a speech? Or hold a news conference for Ban Kai Moon to make some lukewarm comments? |
| Posted by: Bill Clinton 2013-10-30 11:38 |