You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Ferocious, Weak and Crazy: The North Korean Strategy
2013-12-16
This article was originally posted back on January 9. But as the editor points out, events since then have born out the author's points.

The author posits that fat boy North Korea has positioned itself as ferocious "by appearing to have, or to be on the verge of having, devastating power." Certainly, thousands of artillery pieces aimed at Seoul and the occasional shelling elsewhere have helped.

Second, they positioned themselves as being weak such that no matter how ferocious they are, there would be no point in pushing them because they are going to collapse anyway. And third, they positioned themselves as crazy, meaning pushing them would be dangerous since they were liable to engage in the greatest risks imaginable at the slightest provocation.

The article then shifts to "The China Angle and the Iranian Pupil". The Chinese may be using North Korea to further their aim of territorial expansion against the Japanese.

"It is impossible for us to know what the Chinese are thinking, and we have no overt basis for assuming the Chinese and North Koreans are collaborating, but we do note that China has taken an increasing interest in stabilizing North Korea. For its part, North Korea has tended to stage these crises -- and their subsequent Chinese interventions -- at quite useful times for Beijing."

Iran has been the best pupil of the Ferocious, Weak and Crazy strategy. "Additionally, Iran's rhetoric at times can certainly be considered crazy: Tehran has carefully cultivated perceptions that it would wage nuclear war even if this meant the death of all Iranians. Like North Korea, Iran also has managed to retain its form of government and its national sovereignty. Endless predictions of the fall of the Islamic republic to a rising generation have proved false."
The west needs to find a more effective way to counter this strategy.
Posted by:Thraiger Elmetch4894

#1  Neither the DPRK nor Rising China is interested in maintaining the Cold War-esque "status quo" in NE Asia anymore - SOMETHING M-U-S-T CHANGE NOW, BE IT PEACEFULLY DIPLOMATICALLY, OR BY REGIONAL OR WORLD WAR.

I'm highly curious as to what kind of diplomatic offers or concessions, etc. that the Bammer, SecState Jaawhn, + Caroline Kennedy could make to China that will PERMANENTLY prevent a NE Asia war, or worse.

There is no sign that China is willing to give up, delay, or amend its "post-US" Manifest Destiny as the world's one-n-only successor in global leadership to the "weak/declining" USA Superpower, whilst the OWG "Co-Superpower" agendum aka Pacific-sharing will be all but impossible for China to attain short-of-war andor covert [read, PDeniable], unilateral, de facto US withdrawal towards Hawaii + EASTPAC.

Given its ambitions, the only rationale I can see for post-US wannabe Rising China to maintain the status quo or accept econ concessions, ee to NOT in engage in NT mil conflict, is TO HELP ASSURE THE ELECTION ANOTHER ANTI-US GLOBALIST AS OBAMA'S POST-JAN. 2017 POTUS SUCCESSOR, TO INCLUDE ADMIN/CABINET MEMBERS [read, FUTURE POTUSES]. China desires a DE FACTO PERMAMENT solution to its strategic access issues, NOT A TEMPORARY ONE THAT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGES IN POTUS ADMINS EVERY 4-8 YEARS.

As for the DPRK, the Sino-Japan Crisis + other invol Beijing must be a godsend to it. IT IS NOT IN EITHER THE DRPK OR ROK'S INTEREST, AS "SOLE" SEPARATE NATIONS OR REUNIFIED, TO REMAIN SUBORNED TO CHINA even IFF THE US GIVES UP EAST CHINA + 1/2 OF THE PACIFIC TO CHINA AS PER THE OWG-NWO GLOBALIST "CO-SUPERPOWER" AGENDA.

Unfortunately, unless the Taiwan issue can be resolved ASAP AMAP ALAP in China's favor, as things stand its actually in the DPRK's covert strategic interest for anti-China major war to break out in both the ECS + SCS [India?] AS NORTH KOREA'S PERIORITY IS PREVENTING CHINESE STATE TAKEOVER BY ANY + ALL MEANS NECESSARY.

Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-12-16 01:29  

00:00