You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Senate Democrats plan vote to reverse Citizens United decision
2014-05-01
[THEHILL] Senate Democrats will schedule a vote this year on a constitutional amendment to reform campaign finance as they face tens of millions of dollars worth of attack ads from conservative groups.

The Senate will vote on an amendment sponsored by Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) that would overturn two recent court cases that have given corporations, labor unions and wealthy individuals free rein to spend freely on federal races.
"The Supreme Court is trying to take this country back to the days of the robber barons, allowing dark money to flood our elections. That needs to stop, and it needs to stop now," said Senate Rules Committee Chairman Chuck Schumer
Senator-for-life from New York, renowned for his love of standing in front of cameras. Schumer has been a professional politician since 1975, when disco was in flower.
(D-N.Y.), who announced the plan.
Does that mean the Democrats will stop taking money from billionaire donors?
"The only way to undo the damage the court has done is to pass Senator Udall's amendment to the Constitution, and Senate Democrats are going to try to do that," he said.

Schumer said the vote would take place by year's end and called on Republican colleagues to join Democrats to ensure "the wealthy can't drown out middle-class voices in our Democracy."

The amendment has little chance of becoming a part of the Constitution anytime soon because Republicans generally support the high court's decisions in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and McCutcheon v. FEC.
In other words, it'll never get passed in the House, and has no chance to become law. *yawn* Grandstanding is soooo 2009
Posted by:Fred

#7  Both cash contributions and in-kind contributions - phone banks, leaflets, mailings, headstone reading, GOTV activities, Intimidation work, etc...
Posted by: CrazyFool   2014-05-01 18:50  

#6  I would mind putting restrictions on the donations of corporations IF AND ONLY IF they put the same restrictions on unions. And that ain't gonna happen.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2014-05-01 17:58  

#5  This message will resonate with the Dem core, a/k/a Low Information Intelligence Voters

FIFY Uncle P.
Posted by: AlanC   2014-05-01 16:06  

#4  Yeah, RJ, the $20 trillion debt the kids have now - well, that's what the current crop of congress critters has lined up for them.
Posted by: Bobby   2014-05-01 12:36  

#3  This will see that Republicans will get more money,WE MUST STOP THIS AT ALL COSTS, THE CHILDREN, THE PUBLIC WILL BE HARMED, WE CAN'T HAVE THAT.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2014-05-01 11:50  

#2  It will go nowhere, but the Donks will blame "Obstructionist" Tea-Party Conservatives.

This message will resonate with the Dem core, a/k/a Low Information Voters.
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2014-05-01 10:30  

#1  As the Democrats watch their party go down the drain, frantically, yet futiley racing around the deck, moving chairs and hoping the band will play on... November 2014 elections approach, Republican, Democrat and also ran parties gather their chips to play the 1972 game...



Posted by: Pholuter Lover of the Mongol Horde   2014-05-01 09:22  

00:00