| Submit your comments on this article | |
| -Short Attention Span Theater- | |
| USSC: International Chemical Weapons Treaty Doesn't Apply to Wife Harassing Husband's Lover | |
| 2014-06-04 | |
| |
| Posted by:Anguper Hupomosing9418 |
| #5 If the Supreme Court had ruled the other way, what punishment does the treaty on chemical weapons stipulate? Under the equal protection clause I would insist on the same punishment as pencil-neck; i.e. nothing. |
| Posted by: Squinty 2014-06-04 18:26 |
| #4 The Supreme Court ruled that the federal law shouldn't have been used to prosecute Bond, as her actions were forbidden under state or local laws. You mean someone up there still recognizes the 10th amendment? Or is this another 'one from column A and one from column B' excuse to avoid some esoteric conflict with an earlier power grab? |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2014-06-04 08:18 |
| #3 It seems to me Snow White's wicked stepmother had the best technique for such things... I wonder how long the Supreme Court justices pondered the issue? |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2014-06-04 07:45 |
| #2 Might try putting it on oranges next time.... |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2014-06-04 01:09 |
| #1 Bond was eventually videotaped spreading chemicals on items her former friend, Myrlinda Haynes, might touch, 24 separate times. Haynes avoided injury in most of those incidents, largely because the chemicals' bright orange color tipped her off that something was up. A cunning genius plot, but every ointment has it's fly, as they say. |
| Posted by: SteveS 2014-06-04 00:28 |