You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Fifth Column
Chuck Todd: This Has All Been About Emptying Gitmo
2014-06-06
Video at the RCP link. Hat tip to Ace.
WILLIE GEIST: Help us out here. We've laid out all the facts. We've talked to a lot of people over the last several days. It feels like there's something missing at the center of this story. I think everyone here -- Republican, Democrat, whoever you are -- wants to believe that there's something grand here, that there's some other plan. But it doesn't appear there is. What are we missing?

CHUCK TODD: I have to say, I think this is all about Gitmo. Everything about this has been about Gitmo, and finally we heard an Obama administration official yesterday, Marie Harf, one of the spokespeople at the State Department, for the first time said something on the record that I had been hearing on background and off the record is, "We had to get something for these guys because we were eventually going to have to release them anyway." And she said this on the record, and it goes back to -- and I wanted to sort of second something that I heard Bill say, which is, this is about Gitmo. The entire PR attempt on the weekend was about almost deflecting what they anticipated to be a sharp political fight about the decision to start releasing Gitmo detainees starting with these five -- and in this case they decided to quote, unquote get something for these five -- and I think they anticipated that fight so they thought well, let's do a rally-around-the-flag moment. We know that there was certainly a bipartisan group of members of Congress who wanted Bergdahl released.

But this is why I've been sort of awestruck over the last six days, which is many ways the shiny metal object here has been Bergdahl when really I think the entire motivation is starting the emptying out of Gitmo and starting this decision, which is going to be a very difficult process politically. We've seen how difficult it's been. The president, on his second day in office, signed that executive order with some flourish, and, of course, within a month, Mitch McConnell and a lot of other senators, not just Republicans, but a lot of other senators were essentially trying to stop this. So, I think this whole thing has been about starting the emptying of Gitmo and then doing that PR campaign, they thought, well, let's deflect the debate a little bit, and let's see if we can lower the temperature of the Gitmo debate.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  A little bit hard with Baron Reid running the Senate, demanding an omnibus funding bill. Maybe if any time in the future the Trunks have control of both houses, we can go back to the old republic operation of sending individual funding bills to the WH. He can veto them, but then their his not Congresses problems. By that time only the koolaid drinkers will still be in his corner.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-06-06 13:52  

#4  Yep, there is no stomach for exercising the Congressional power of the purse.
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-06-06 10:20  

#3  A belligerent adolescent can sometimes be controlled by a cutting off of allowances and funding. Too bad our Congress cannot employ a similar tactic against a recalcitrant, boldfaced liar and corrupt regime. Makes one curious about activities behind the curtain.

Posted by: Besoeker   2014-06-06 06:50  

#2  I am sure the whitehouse will begin to suggest that any additional criticism will force them to release the remaining Gitmo inmates into the US. So back off and let us screw America in our own leftist way.
Posted by: Airandee   2014-06-06 05:35  

#1  Yes, clearly about GITMO and Champ's legacy. We're already aware of what the regime thinks of soldiers and veterans. Appears Bergdahl was, as the article suggests, little more than public relations theater, another grand deflection. Unfortunately, regime decision makers [in their rush to pump up falling poll numbers] failed to take into account a few 'not so minor' details regarding Bergdahl. Now a new cover-up must be undertaken.

Attention to detail has never been a regime strong suite. They continue to foul their beds in denial, exchanging sheets with on another to begin anew.

Posted by: Besoeker   2014-06-06 02:52  

00:00