You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
That Awkward Moment A Judge Throws Out Your "Murder" Case Because You're A Moron Of A Prosecutor
2014-06-22
[Bearing Arms]We first wrote about the absurd case against US Air Force Tech Sgt. Matt Pinkerton in early November, when he was charged with murder by Assistant State's Attorney Glen Neubauer. What was Pinkerton's crime? Not pausing to dial 9-1-1 after Kendall Green forced is way into Pinkerton's home at 2:00 AM.

Our friend and Bearing Arms contributor Mike McDaniel has been following the Pinkerton case on his own site, and now reports that charges against Pinkerton have been dismissed by the judge and that's no small thing:

Pinkerton was apparently not acquitted, in other words, found not guilty of the charges. There is a significant difference in the process of the similar outcomes. To be acquitted, one much normally endure a complete trial and a jury must render a “not guilty” verdict. In this case it seems that the judge determined that there wasn't enough evidence to sustain any of the multiple charges against Pinkerton. If this trial followed the normal course of such things, after the prosecution presented its case, the defense asked that the judge dismiss the charges because the prosecution failed to sustain its burden of proof, and that request was obviously granted, likely with prejudice, meaning the charges cannot be refilled in the future. If so, the case is over.

There is, however, one additional possibility: the judge might have dismissed prior to the conclusion of the prosecution's case, so obvious was the prosecution's lack of evidence, so poorly did the prosecutor observe Maryland state law. If that happened, it is unusual indeed. Prosecutors normally do not bring murder charges absent a very strong case, and judges are normally reluctant to dismiss a murder case before all potential evidence has been heard.
Posted by:Squinty

#6  the USAF Service Member is out the cost of his lawyers and defense

This is the problem with prosecutorial abuse; the state pays the prosecutor's expenses and the innocent defender is out their life savings. I have seen it happen. Prosecutors are not held responsible for their transgressions. Until they are, this abuse will continue.
Posted by: Squinty   2014-06-22 12:24  

#5  Basically the USAF Service Member is out the cost of his lawyers and defense. Probably enough to bankrupt him. When a case gets tossed like this, I think the prosecutors should be held liable. Also, that TSgt has a felony murder arrest now on his record. Can he get that expunged?
Posted by: OldSpook   2014-06-22 12:02  

#4  A lawyer friend of mine once told me that if you are indicted, you can't sue for false arrest, even if you are acquitted or the charges are dropped. (At least in New York state)
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2014-06-22 11:11  

#3  ...Remember the old saying that a Prosecutor can get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich. What I'd ask at this point is what kind of ambitions does Counselor Neubauer have...?

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2014-06-22 04:57  

#2  Grand Juries usually give the Prosecutor the benefit of the doubt. Prosecutors sometimes take a weak or flawed case to the Grand Jury to cover themselves and/or the Investigators. In most states the Prosecution does not need to go to a Grand Jury at all.
Posted by: Jimp Forkbeard8158   2014-06-22 00:23  

#1  One would assume that the prosecution had to present evidence to a grand jury who indicted the Tech Sgt.. Sounds like a failure of the grand jury process. It would be interesting to know what evidence was presented at the grand jury; was it false?
Posted by: Squinty   2014-06-22 00:11  

00:00