You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Report: US said to bomb ISIS targets in Iraq
2014-08-08
[Ynet] Citing Kurdish officials, New York Times
...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...
claims the US has hit two targets in northern Iraq after Islamic State seized Kurdish towns; Pentagon: Reports of attack 'completely false'

What a lovely idea -- that it's real, I mean.
The US bombed "at least two targets in Iraq" Thursday night, the New York Times reported. However a spokesperson for the Pentagon said the reports were "completely false."

Citing Kurdish officials the paper said American military forces hit at least two targets in northern Iraq on Thursday night in an attempt to block Islamist snuffies who have trapped tens of thousands of religious minorities in Kurdish areas.

"Press reports that US has conducted Arclight airstrikes in Iraq completely false," Rear Admiral John Kirby said in a post on his Twitter feed. "No such action taken."

Kirby's statement came as US officials said that the B.O. regime has approved military air drops of humanitarian supplies in northern Iraq and is considering strikes against fighters from the Islamic State, an al Qaeda offshoot.

According to the paper, the bombings were reported on Kurdish television located in the city of Erbil. The paper also noted that the events came as President B.O. was preparing to make a statement in Washington.

According to the NYT report, Kurdish officials said the bombings targeted fighters from the Islamic State who had recently seized two towns, Gwer and Mahmour.

The United States has approved military air drops of humanitarian supplies in northern Iraq for religious minorities fleeing attacks by Islamist murderous Moslems and they could start at any time, a senior U.S. official said on Thursday.

Officials said President Barack Obama
I am not a dictator!...
was also weighing carrying out the first US Arclight airstrikes in Iraq since a 2011 pullout of troops.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, the officials said the United States was considering acting amid international concern over the fate of 40,000 members of religious minorities driven out of their homes and trapped on an Iraqi mountaintop under threat from the Lion of Islams.

US government sources said the United States would be flying surveillance drones out of the Kurdish capital Erbil as part of a mission to assess the Islamic State threat and the capability of Iraqi and Kurdish forces to confront it.

White House front man Josh Earnest told news hounds earlier that Obama had met members of his national security team on Thursday. Earnest declined to say whether US military intervention in Iraq was being considered.

Any Arclight airstrikes would represent the first combat action by the United States in Iraq since it ended eight years of war in 2011. Earlier this year the United States sent in a small number of military advisers to help the Iraqi government address the threat of the Islamic Lion of Islam offensive.

Earnest said Obama had made clear in the past that any US military action would be "very limited in scope," would not involve putting troops on the ground, and should be closely tied to Iraqi political reforms, which Washington has demanded.

"We're working intensively with the government of Iraq - the Iraqi security forces and the Kurdish authorities in the immediate area to support their efforts to address the humanitarian situation in Sinjar," Earnest said.

Although he declined to directly address the issue of possible US action at Sinjar, Earnest stressed the strict limits of any US military involvement in Iraq. "There are no American military solutions to the problems in Iraq," he said.

The Islamic State's Sunni Lion of Islams, an offshoot of al Qaeda who have swept across northwestern Iraq in recent weeks, have come within a 30-minute drive of Erbil. The Islamic State views as infidels Iraq's majority Shi'ites and minorities such as Christians and Yazidis, a Kurdish ethno-religious community.

Near the White House, some 80 people protested for hours on behalf of the Yazidis, shaking US flags, chanting slogans and holding up signs condemning what they called a holocaust of Christian communities in Iraq and Syria by the Islamic State.

Some of the many thousands trapped on Sinjar mountain have been rescued in the past 24 hours, a front man for the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said earlier, adding that 200,000 had fled the fighting.

Earnest said the responsibility for the humanitarian crisis in Iraq, including that on Sinjar mountain, lay with the Iraqi leaders who had failed to create a united government to address the interests of the country's Shi'ites, Sunnis and Kurds.

The Islamist fighters, who have killed many thousands and declared a caliphate in the Iraqi area they conquered, are now threatening Kurdistan, previously considered a bastion of stability in a country ravaged by conflict.

Bernadette Meehan, spokeswoman for Obama's National Security Council, told Rooters on Wednesday that any provision of US weapons to the Kurds "must be coordinated with central government authorities, in Iraq and elsewhere."

But she added that given the threat from the Islamic State, "the United States will continue to engage with Baghdad and Arbil to enhance cooperation on the security front and other issues."
The Jerusalem Post has much the same facts but a very different take on the story here. And considerably more, with a map, from the Wall Street Journal, including this particular bit:
The administration was actively considering U.S. Arclight airstrikes against the bully boy group's positions to protect U.S. military and diplomatic personnel working in the northern Iraqi city of Erbil. Pentagon officials said no U.S. strikes had begun by Thursday evening. An Iraqi military official said the Iraqi air force conducted some Arclight airstrikes Thursday.

The White House and Pentagon have said they reserve the right to use force in Iraq to protect Americans, and repeated that stance Thursday. The U.S. troops in Erbil are part of a force of planners and advisers working in joint U.S.-Iraqi centers.
Posted by:trailing wife

#9  There are more than 30 million Kurds (in Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Syria, etc.) and yet they don't have their own country, only autonomy. Unlike the Palestinians, Kurds have a distinct ethnicity and languages. They (like Israel) are pro-US, relative to others in the region. They are completely deserving of our support.
Posted by: Odysseus   2014-08-08 21:28  

#8  The Pentagon at this time is officially denying this NYT report.

Still in a Wait-N-See.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-08-08 20:08  

#7  Correction to #4 - the Kurds most definitely are not out to kill the other 2 parts. They are the only demonstrably tolerant group in the bunch -- and quite western in their views of economy and religious tolerance. Get your facts straight - that would perhaps alter your argument.
Posted by: OldSpook   2014-08-08 13:11  

#6  Is ISIS being used as a proxy force from the Gulf countries versus Iran backed Iraq?

Do some research on it, Paul. There's plenty of info.
Posted by:    2014-08-08 10:19  

#5  Paul D, if IS is a proxy for anyone, at this point it has to be the Gulf Arabs. The Saudis just dropped a billion dollars plus on the Lebanese Armed Forces as they were fighting with an IS associated raiding force in Arsal, and if the reports that the Turks were the ones bombing the IS on the Kurdish front, then the idea that the IS is an Erdogan puppet seems kind of far-fetched.

On the other hand, both the Saudis and the Turks could have stood up the IS and then turned around and funded their opponents and bombed them. It's the Middle East, the left hand can often be found stabbing the right hand between the metacarpals.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2014-08-08 09:01  

#4  Is it in US interests to have Iraq divided up into three large parts and each of them trying to kill each other?

Can we encourage Iraq to have three Moslem contenders? And can we set them all on one another and keep it cooking? Can we draw Iran into it bigtime? Wars cost money...their money. Bood...their blood. The US has a growing domestic supply of petroleum and gas resources...right here at home. If Iran and Iraq lose their market share due to destroyed, interdicted, or obsolete sources....who gets hurt on the international market?
Do the EUroweenies have Oil? China have "enough"? How many ways to play it?

Obama is going to bomb Iraq? Him? C'mon....look at the source of the story. The NYT? Yeah?
Posted by: Big Thromoth3646   2014-08-08 07:15  

#3  Is ISIS being used as a proxy force from the Gulf countries versus Iran backed Iraq?
Posted by: Paul D   2014-08-08 01:15  

#2  You gotta ask yourself, "Who Would Jesus Bomb?". WWJB, man.
Posted by: SteveS   2014-08-08 01:14  

#1  The administration was actively considering U.S. Arclight airstrikes against the bully boy group's positions to protect U.S. military and diplomatic personnel working in the northern Iraqi city of Erbil.

Yes, a media broadcast of the crucifixion of U.S. personnel would be most embarrassing for the Champ regime. My guess is Champ will be pulling U.S. personnel out forthwith. Targeted drone zaps of troublesome individuals by the Champ, good-to-go. America victorious against a larger Islamic threat simply cannot happen.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-08-08 01:08  

00:00