Submit your comments on this article |
Britain |
Britain Proposes Anti-Extremism Curbs on Civil Liberties |
2014-10-01 |
[AnNahar] Britannia's interior minister on Tuesday proposed measures to ban bully boy groups and curb the activities of radical Islamist preachers even if they have committed no crime, in a move denounced as "wholly wrong" by campaigners. "Not all extremism leads to violence and not all bully boyz are violent, but the damage caused by extremism to our society is reason enough to act," Home Secretary Theresa May told the annual Conservative party conference in Birmingham. "We must face down extremism in all its forms. We must stand up for our values, she said, adding: "I want to see new civil powers to target bully boyz who stay just within the law." The clampdown, which would be enacted if Prime Minister ![]() ... has stated that he is certainly a big Thatcher fan, but I don't know whether that makes me a Thatcherite,which means he's not. Since he is not deeply ideologicalhe lacks core principles and is easily led. He has been described as certainly not a Pitt, Elder or Younger,but he does wear a nice suit so maybe he's Beau Brummel ... 's Conservatives are re-elected in May, follows growing concern about radicalized youths heading to fight with Islamist groups in Syria and Iraq. Under the proposed "Extremism Disruption Orders", British courts would have the power to restrict the activities of individuals to prevent the risk of violence and public disorder, officials said. Individuals could be banned from speaking at public events, taking part in protests or speaking through the media -- a proposal that revives memories of a controversial BBC ban on Irish republican leader Gerry Adams from Sinn Fein during the unrest in Northern Ireland. They could also be ordered to submit any material to the police for vetting before it is put onto the Internet. Separate "banning orders" would extend existing laws to allow groups to be outlawed even if they did not pose a violent threat, including on the grounds of being a "threat" to democracy. Membership of such groups would then become a criminal offense. Emma Carr, director of Big Brother Watch, a civil liberties think tank, said the policies were the "thin end of the wedge". "In a democratic country, it is wholly wrong for people to be labeled an 'extremist' and face having major restrictions placed on their freedom without facing a due legal process and a transparent and accountable system," she said. "The Home Secretary must think very carefully about the international precedent that this policy would set and consider the potential consequences for members of the public." Officials said the measures, which are to be included in the Conservative manifesto for the general election, would not only target Islamists but could also be used against neo-Nazis or other hardline groups. British police tossed in the calaboose Maw! They're comin' to get me, Maw! the high-profile radical Islamist preacher Anjem Choudary last week along with others suspected of links to a banned bully boy group and militancy. Choudary, who was released on bail, said the arrest was "politically motivated" and claimed it was linked to preparations for last week's vote in the British parliament on joining air strikes against the Islamic State ...formerly ISIS or ISIL, depending on your preference. Before that al-Qaeda in Iraq, as shaped by Abu Musab Zarqawi. They're very devout, committing every atrocity they can find in the Koran and inventing a few more. They fling Allaharound with every other sentence, but to hear the pols talk they're not reallyMoslems.... group in Iraq. May said passports had been withdrawn from 25 British nationals suspected of planning to travel to Syria to join IS jihadists and said the police had made 103 arrests this year "linked to terrorism in Syria". Among those arrested, 24 have been charged and five convicted, she said. |
Posted by:trailing wife |
#10 Awwwww, #1, I wanted to say it. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2014-10-01 21:54 |
#9 The English concept of free speech has always been inferior to ours in the USA. They're not nearly as well armed as we are. |
Posted by: RandomJD 2014-10-01 20:41 |
#8 Folks that don't believe in Global Warming are extremists! |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2014-10-01 14:35 |
#7 KBK, for now. The Tranzis are pushing for censorship in the form of blasphemy laws all over the world. |
Posted by: AlanC 2014-10-01 13:24 |
#6 The English concept of free speech has always been inferior to ours in the USA. |
Posted by: KBK 2014-10-01 13:20 |
#5 Get rid of PC restrictions and direct the efforts at those who are actually doing terrorism would be a good start. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2014-10-01 12:29 |
#4 Anybody thinking that Tranzis encouraged Muzzi extremism to justify such laws needs a tin hat---don't they? |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2014-10-01 12:28 |
#3 Remember for all these |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2014-10-01 09:45 |
#2 while I support the sentiment I don't support the proposal. How long before this type of speech censorship is used against political opponents? The "out of the EU" movement wouldn't last 6 months. UKIP is already considered extremist by the elites. Nope, don't go there. |
Posted by: AlanC 2014-10-01 07:12 |
#1 Enthusiastic following of Australia's lead. |
Posted by: Skidmark 2014-10-01 00:41 |