You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Kurdish defeat at Kobani 'inevitable'
2014-10-12
[ARABNEWS] Kurdish forces defending Kobani urged a US-led coalition to escalate Arclight airstrikes on Islamic State
...formerly ISIS or ISIL, depending on your preference. Before that al-Qaeda in Iraq, as shaped by Abu Musab Zarqawi. They're very devout, committing every atrocity they can find in the Koran and inventing a few more. They fling Allah around with every other sentence, but to hear the pols talk they're not really Moslems....
bandidos krazed killers who tightened their grip on the Syrian town at the border with Turkey on Saturday.

A group that monitors the Syrian civil war said the Kurdish forces faced inevitable defeat in Kobani if Turkey did not open its border to let through arms -- something Ankara has so far appeared reluctant to do.

A Kurdish military official said Islamic State had brought extra tanks and artillery to the front lines, while street-to-street fighting was making it harder for the warplanes to target Islamic State positions.

While Islamic State has been able to reinforce its fighters, the Kurds have not. Islamic State has besieged the town to the east, south and west, meaning the Kurds' only possible supply route is the Turkish border to the north.

The B.O. regime is boxed in by its promise to limit US military engagement against the terror group, making it tough to agree to Turkey's condition for joining the fight.

Turkey and other US allies want the US to create a no-fly zone inside Syrian territory. Doing so would mean embracing one of two options US President Barack Obama
Because I won...
has long resisted: Cooperating with Syrian Hereditary President-for-Life Bashir Pencilneck al-Assad
Horror of Homs...
's government or taking out its air defenses, action tantamount to war.

Airstrikes alone might not prevent Lions of Islam from carrying out a massacre at a Kurdish border town now under attack, but for now the US isn't steering a new course in its expanded, one-month counterterrorism effort in Iraq and Syria.

Demands are rising for the creation of a secure buffer on the Syrian side of its frontier with Turkey.

Any decision by Gulf states to send in troops would depend on whether Turkey decides to use its own ground forces, according to Mathieu Guidere, professor of Middle East Studies at Toulouse
...lies on the banks of the River Garonne, half-way between the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea. The Toulouse metropolitan area is the fourth-largest in La Belle France...
University.

"A ground intervention from Arab countries depends on the Turkish decision to engage or not ground troops. We are likely to see Arab boots on the ground if Turkish forces engage in the Syrian territory," he said.

Abdulkhaleq Abdulla, political science professor at the University of the Emirates, said: "America is far from frank about its true intentions."

He added: There is the constant fear that every time the US touches the Middle East, it makes things worse and instead of solving regional problems, it invariably creates bigger ones."

Abdulla said "Iran has a proven record of taking advantage of America's mistakes. It could be once again the net beneficiary of this campaign" against the radical fighters.
Posted by:Fred

#4  Update ...

* BHARAT RAKSHAK > KURDISH LEADER THREATENS TURKEY PEACE DEAL COLLAPSE, as due to Turkey's continuing non-intervention in defence of ISIS-embattled Kurds at Kobani.

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > [Telegraph.UK] IRAQ [formally] ASKS FOR US GROUND TROOPS AS ISIL THREATENS BAGHDAD.

* RELATED SAME > LEADERS OF IRAQ'S ANBAR PROVINCE: SEND US TROOPS TO STOP ISIS - CNN.COM.

A "Gen. MacArthur Moment" for the Bammer, i.e. shade of the General reminding POTUS Franklin Roosevelt prior to the invasion of Leyte that Japan is claiming that Americans = White Americans ["Whitey"] will NOT fight or shed an ounce of their blood for Brown andor Yellow Asians, THUS FOR THE US NOT TO INVADE THE PHILIPPINES WOULD BE A US NATIONAL DISGRACE, AN INSULT TO ASIA, + A SERIOUS OR SEVERE FOREIGN POLICY DISASTER FOR THE US FOR YEARS OR DECADES AFTER THE WAR IS FINALLY OVER???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-10-12 21:33  

#3  We have a Prez who more rhetoric than substance. He drew too many lines in the sand and didn't follow up with action. A kind of version of "cried wolf" too many times.
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-10-12 14:07  

#2  Headded: There is the constant fear that every time the US touches the Middle East, it makes things worse and instead of solving regional problems, it invariably creates bigger ones."

The result of wanting to be loved rather than respected (and fear is a form of respect as in 'you really don't want my attention').
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-10-12 10:42  

#1  The B.O. regime is boxed in by its promise to limit US military engagement against the terror group, making it tough to agree to Turkey's condition for joining the fight.

The coalition is actually winning. It's a very nuanced kind of thing that only the Harvard-educated can appreciate (sarc).
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-10-12 09:57  

00:00