You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
IRS: Um, Yeah, We Never Actually Looked for Lois Lerner's Emails
2014-11-08
[BREITBART] IRS
...the Internal Revenue Service; that office of the United States government that collects taxes and persecutes the regime's political enemies...
attorneys conceded that they had failed to search the agency's servers for missing emails because they decided that "the servers would not result in the recovery of any information." They admitted they had failed to search the agency's disaster recovery tapes because they had "no reason to believe that the tapes are a potential source of recovering" the missing emails. And they conceded that they had not searched the government-wide back-up system because they had "no reason to believe such a system ... even exists."

The IRS admitted to Judge Sullivan that the agency failed to "submit declarations about any of the foregoing items because it had no reason to believe that they were sources from which to recover information lost as a result of Lerner's hard drive failure." [Emphasis added] Department of Justice attorneys for the IRS had previously told Judicial Watch that Lois Lerner
...the former head of the IRS Exempt Unit. She is a past president of the Council on Governmental Ethics Laws and a member of the Massachussetts bar. She was held in contempt of Congress for her role in the IRS targeting of regime political enemies and refusing to testify. The dog ate her computer's hard drive with all her emails on it...
's emails, indeed all government computer records, are backed up by the federal government in case of a government-wide catastrophe. The B.O. regime attorneys said that this back-up system would be too onerous to search.

In the October federal court filing, the IRS does not deny that the government-wide back-up system exists, and acknowledges to the court that 760 other email "servers" have been discovered but had not been searched. The IRS also refuses to disclose the names of the IRS officials who may have information about the IRS scandal, citing unspecified threats. The IRS says it pulled documents about the scandal from various employees into a "Congressional database" and that it has only searched this one "database" for missing records. Incredibly, the IRS has not searched any of the IRS's regular computer systems for any missing records and admits that it has only searched a "database" that it knows does not contain the missing records being sought by the court, Judicial Watch, and Congress.
Considerably more detail from Judicial Watch here, with thanks to Beavis for the submission.
Posted by:Fred

#14  JohnQC - I had the other part of the tax seminar on Thursday. During the PM session, a guy came in from the Mass. Dept. of Revenue (I worked there for four years). Within ten minutes, half the CPA's in the room start peppering him with half-angry questions, like 'why's it take four months to process an amended return?', 'Why's my client getting audited over a $100 EITC deduction?', why's my client still getting demand notices after entering into a payment agreement?', etc. It was f'n beautiful. TKO for the CPA's in the first round. First time I've seen that in all the years I've gone to this thing.

My takeaways from all that - 1) Bring a cup next time, DOR Guy! 2) Finally, other CPA's are growing a pair and are pushing back. About damned time!
Posted by: Raj   2014-11-08 16:21  

#13  I'd shitcan half of the Exempt Org. staff nationwide and rebuild it from scratch if it were up to me.

Raj: And a great number of others out here too. You sound much like my accountant. I said to him one time, you are fairly conservative, eh? He said: "I like to think of myself as a good American."
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-11-08 15:35  

#12  If Circular 230 rules applied to anyone at the IRS involved in sending out those harassment letters and / or delaying the processing of their application, they should all be fired and stripped of their pensions.

The mood I'm in right now, I'd shitcan half of the Exempt Org. staff nationwide and rebuild it from scratch if it were up to me.

If I pulled anything as egregious like that on a tax return or an audit, I'd be up in front of their OPR (Office of Professional Responsibility) and probably lose my license for a while or get permanently disbarred.

But hey, rules are for the little people...
Posted by: Raj   2014-11-08 14:00  

#11  IRS director belongs in JAIL under contempt charges until he and his department can A) produce those emails and B) document the efforts to do so in detail.
Posted by: OldSpook   2014-11-08 13:23  

#10  I went to a year-end tax seminar yesterday, and a former IRS employee actually defended this shit (rouge employees in Cincy, etc.). Since it was done during the lunch session, and not the best forum for pulling this clown's pants down in front of sixty other CPA's, I shot him the dirtiest look possible as I stood up, and walked out in the middle of that excuse factory. Judging from the looks I got from the other CPA's as I walked out, and a few private conversations I had with some of the others afterwards, safe to say that few, if any, people were buying his bullshit.
Posted by: Raj   2014-11-08 11:54  

#9  If the media was worth anything, they would have been on this like stink on a monkey. The press is the last bulwark against tyranny before things degenerate to dictatorship and possible civil war.

The ballot box, possibly, but that takes an educated and informed electorate. And today, that is a tough order. Stuffing ballot boxes and manipulating vote counts, etc, IMHO, is a very serious crime, bordering on treason.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2014-11-08 11:29  

#8  Ibudee, ibudee, ibudee, that's all, folks...
Posted by: ed in texas   2014-11-08 08:58  

#7  Ed: You've got your selector switch set on 'double tap.'
Posted by: Besoeker


Nah Besoeker, Ed stutters a lot...
Posted by: Spanky Thuth2245   2014-11-08 08:48  

#6  why didnt congress just approve of an external group to interview IT peeps, look for the info THEMSELVES, and then a bonus for recovery.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2014-11-08 08:19  

#5  Directly disobeyed an order of Congress. Someone should go to jail.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2014-11-08 08:08  

#4  Ed: You've got your selector switch set on 'double tap.'
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-11-08 07:44  

#3  Because they weren't going to turn them over anyway.
Posted by: ed in texas   2014-11-08 07:42  

#2  Because they weren't going to turn them over anyway.
Posted by: ed in texas   2014-11-08 07:42  

#1  14 years ago, an agency GM explained to a large staff meeting how hard it would be ti find subpoenaed e-mails. To her horror, the IT guy corrected her and explained how quick and easy it was.
Posted by: Bobby   2014-11-08 07:40  

00:00