Comments

You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name

Your e-mail (optional)

Website (optional)

	My Original Nic Pic-a-Nic Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Foto

Submit your comments on this article

Home Front: Politix

Chris Matthews: Hillary "Could Really Rule This Country"

2015-02-04

[REALCLEARPOLITICS] Chris My Thigh is Tingling! Matthews
... the late Tip O'Neill's former gopher who has magazines with centerfolds of Barack Obama
praised a potential

Hillary Clinton
... sometimes described as The Liberatress of Libya and at other times as Mrs. Bill, never as Another Edward Everett ...
presidency where "she could really rule this country" as a result of a decisive electoral victory.

"This country needs somebody to get control of it," Matthews said about a Clinton presidency on the Monday broadcast of his MSNBC show.

"I think she should go for a 55% victory, 54% victory because then she could bring the House in, she could bring the Senate in and she could really rule this country. This country needs somebody to get control of it," Matthews told his Hardball audience.

Kings rule. Presidents govern, a much more challenging approach.

Posted by:Fred

#13 On the Clintons, We have all had enough of these Scoundrels, go home Grandma Hillie, and play with your grandchild while you still have time.

Posted by: Spinetch Pelosi3286 2015-02-04 19:35

#12 Perhaps he meant rue, as in rue the day.

Posted by: rjschwarz 2015-02-04 14:58

#11 Rule or rile?

Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2015-02-04 13:03

#10 I'll bet he's seen Evita about fifty times as well.

Posted by: Pappy 2015-02-04 11:22

#9 Kings rule. Presidents govern, Queens go dancing a much more challenging approach.

Posted by: Sidmark 2015-02-04 10:15

#8 Yes and your avarge street drunkard can handle an F22. What he can't do is not crashing it.

Posted by: JFM 2015-02-04 07:37

Mathews: One or two tablespoons orally per day as needed. Use liberally on the catheter.

Posted by: Besoeker 2015-02-04 06:08

#6 Public employees exist to serve, not rule, except in doctatorships.

Part of that service ca be to lead, which is very different than to rule. That is something which the left and their footsoldiers in the public sector seem to have either forgotten or never understood in the first place.

I wonder what Matthews would think about someone using the verb "rule" if a popularly elected person from the center/right were in office. No doubt he would be aghast. That would be appropriate also. The difference is that while people who are reasonable and morally consistent would prefer not to give that sort of power to ANYONE in government regardless of their political bent, the likes of Matthews are only offended when the opposition has it.

Conclusion: they are not a moral or ethical movement, but power hungry autocrats.

Posted by: no mo uro 2015-02-04 05:51

#5 I wonder if the idea sends a shiver up his . . . whatever.

Posted by: gorb 2015-02-04 01:47

#4 Hillary "Could Really Rule This Country"

Well then, we've got to changeit so Shrillary and Oblahblah, CAN'T.

Posted by: Redneck Jim 2015-02-04 00:19

#3 Over our collective dead bodies, Chris.

Be careful what side of freedom you come down on.

Posted by: DarthVader 2015-02-04 00:16

#2 After his rousing endorsement of youknowwho, Prissy Chrissy has no reliability as a recommendation.

Sort of an F-6 in the old Intel grading system.

Posted by: mystic 2015-02-04 00:09

#1 Mathews channeling ValJar. He'll get the extra point.

Posted by: Besoeker 2015-02-04 00:06

00:00