Submit your comments on this article |
-Short Attention Span Theater- |
Rush: What if Champ wants a third term. |
2015-03-08 |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#13 He doesn't need a third term. The damage has been done and is very likely irreversible at this point. For Champ the next two years are nothing but a victory lap. |
Posted by: Sheater Thud2458 2015-03-08 23:05 |
#12 This is the same bull sh1t that comes up at the end of every term. Sadly it's 8 years and not 4. They said the same for Clinton and Bush. Go friggin away. |
Posted by: jvalentour 2015-03-08 23:04 |
#11 If he ends up in there past his term, he is a dead man walking. Not a threat against the president, but a simple statement of fact: there are people who would willingly arrest and even kill *anyone* that would do that, R or D, as a matter of what they would perceive to be their duty. |
Posted by: OldSpook 2015-03-08 22:51 |
#10 Is there a line anymore? |
Posted by: newc 2015-03-08 21:44 |
#9 It would have to occur on or about the 2016 POTUS Elex, + be serious enough for our mighty Unitarian Anti-Unitarian Congress to suspend the Constitution + Habeas Corpus, to includ suspending the POTUS Elex itself? Safe to say Biden's office, i.e. the Office of the VPOTUS will also be directly or indirectly affected. A bad or problematic economy, or even the assassination or attempted assassination of the Bammer, won't be enuff by themselves. To paraph DONALD "COLONEL Y" SUTHERLAND from PRE-TEXAS-SIZED ASTEROID OLLIE STONE'S "JFK" > "NOTHING CAN BE LEFT TO CHANCE ... THE CONSPIRATORS/PERPETRATORS MUST ALWAYS BE ON THE WINNING SIDE ... THAT, MR. GARRISON [Kevin Costner], IS A COUP D'ETAT"! |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2015-03-08 20:42 |
#8 I think the same as you NoMoreBS. |
Posted by: DarthVader 2015-03-08 19:27 |
#7 Not so much worried about a third term as the idea of a suspension of the constitution and martial law on the basis of some catastrophic event like massive social unrest, or a military conflict within CONUS. I started out believing that this was just a very bad period and we could repair much of the damage this POS has caused. I am no longer very confident that is the case, and increasingly see behaviors that greatly worry me, among them the need for Champ to be seen daily and increasingly, bald-faced lies with little effort to make them credible. |
Posted by: NoMoreBS 2015-03-08 18:38 |
#6 What TW said. It's just not going to happen--unless someone has a great desire for another revolution. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2015-03-08 18:21 |
#5 Could be trouble if he's managed to "diversify" the military by then but I doubt it. I'm afraid Jeb Bush will be bad enough, thank you very much. |
Posted by: Abu Uluque 2015-03-08 17:09 |
#4 A nightmare I've been having more frequently. g(r)om has the right of it. From the day he was elected I thought that a revolution was a possibility though not probable. With his actions lately and the trend for the next two years I am not at all a happy camper. |
Posted by: AlanC 2015-03-08 16:56 |
#3 I just about threw up reading the headline |
Posted by: chris 2015-03-08 16:05 |
#2 The Democrats have lost the White House before. I don't see Mr. Limbagh's scenario as plausible, especially given how many Congresscritters and governors begged the president not to help as they ran for reelection in 2014. He was reportedly very annoyed about it. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2015-03-08 15:28 |
#1 Then, I guess, we'll see if anybody remembers what your second amendment is really for. |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2015-03-08 15:22 |